Teams

LaRoy/Lee/Nashville

2025 Adult 18 & Over - Early Start League-Nashville · 4.0 Women - WED AM

16 players · average NTRP 3.86 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-11-13vs DeMouy/Perry/NashvilleWon 32
W#1 DoublesCassie Bourdon / Tracy LaRoy vs Michelle Salada / Jeanine Dyer6-2, 7-6
L#1 SinglesJenny East vs Roshawnda Roberts3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBrenda Monajjem / Collier Andress Smith vs Angela Tarrance / Caroline Bryan6-4, 6-1
W#2 SinglesCaroline Houck vs April Penny6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesBeth Frame / Niki Delk vs Nikki Downes / Claudia Turner4-6, 1-6
2024-11-06vs Hooper/NashvilleSplit 22
W#1 DoublesMary Elam Polk / Suzanne Eubank vs Lindsey Hundley / Katherine Cigarran6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesCaroline Houck vs Julie Dretler6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJennifer Kelley / Ronda Hawkins vs Collins Hooper / Erica Oliver4-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesJenny East vs Stuart Smothers6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2024-10-16vs Hermann/NashvilleLost 23
L#1 DoublesCassie Bourdon / Mary Elam Polk vs Beth Martin / Betsy Delves2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesDana McKee vs Meredith Scully6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJennifer Kelley / Collier Andress Smith vs Julia Byron / Stephanie Snap4-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesCaroline Houck vs Katherine Goodson4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesBrenda Monajjem / Julie LaLance vs Megan Hartman / Sacha Bone3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-10-04vs DeMouy/Perry/NashvilleWon 41
L#1 DoublesKelly Lee / Julie Wishing vs Michelle Salada / Suzanne Sampietro4-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesCaroline Houck vs Perry Baltasar6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCassie Bourdon / Collier Andress Smith vs Claudia Turner / Nikki Downes6-4, 7-6
W#2 SinglesTracy LaRoy vs Joann Covington6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCindy Chaffin / Niki Delk vs Jeanine Dyer / Melissa Briner2-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women - WED AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Mary Elam Polk
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.83
Collier Andress Smith
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.83
Tracy LaRoy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.74
Dana McKee
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.63
Brenda Monajjem
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.61
Suzanne Eubank
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.60
Joy Owens
published
3.59
Caroline Houck
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4
3.46
Cassie Bourdon
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.39
Julie LaLance
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Jenny East
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.35
Beth Frame
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.34
Cindy Chaffin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Ronda Hawkins
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Julie Wishing
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Niki Delk
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Elam Polk + Collier Andress Smith6067% games+9.1% vs expected
Brenda Monajjem + Ronda Hawkins4252% games+6.0% vs expected
Beth Frame + Cindy Chaffin3450% games+1.5% vs expected
Mary Elam Polk + Suzanne Eubank7158% games+1.1% vs expected
Mary Elam Polk + Cassie Bourdon7252% games−1.0% vs expected
Brenda Monajjem + Joy Owens1444% games−9.4% vs expected
Julie LaLance + Cindy Chaffin314 matchesnot enough data
Julie LaLance + Brenda Monajjem123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary Elam Polk
29W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.84
4
Collier Andress Smith
31W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.83
Tracy LaRoy
17W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Dana McKee
6W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%3%
3.74
4
Brenda Monajjem
26W–32L career · 2 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.63
Suzanne Eubank
15W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.61
Joy Owens
15W–20L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.60
4
Caroline Houck
10W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.59
4
Cassie Bourdon
19W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
60%40%<1%
3.46
Julie LaLance
26W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%78%21%
3.39
Jenny East
14W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Beth Frame
21W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
1%86%13%
3.35
3.5
Cindy Chaffin
27W–23L career · 1 line in 2025
1%86%13%
3.34
Ronda Hawkins
16W–23L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
Julie Wishing
2W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Niki Delk
4W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.