Teams

Yadkin/Whitman/40+6.5 Combo

2026 Yadkin Valley Combo 40 & Over · Men 6.5 - Monday Nights

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 upcoming · 3 played
Sep 14 6:30 PM
Matthew WhitmanTory Wagoner
Sep 21 6:30 PM
Wake Forest University
Sep 28 6:30 PM
Matthew WhitmanTory Wagoner
Oct 5 6:30 PM
Wake Forest University
Oct 12 6:30 PM
Matthew WhitmanTory Wagoner
2026-08-31vs Yadkin/Clay/40+6.5 ComboWon 21
W#1 DoublesAustin Temple / Tory Wagoner vs Chris Blankenship / William Burns6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesPaul Howard / Nathan Ayers vs Matt Crews / David Crews4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRobert Mcouat / RT Ferrell vs Jacobo Araujo Nieto / Adam Elledge3-6, 3-6
2026-08-24vs Yadkin/Clay/40+6.5 ComboWon 21
W#1 DoublesDean Burkhalter / Matthew Whitman vs Chris Blankenship / David Crews6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesPaul Howard / Nathan Ayers vs Matt Crews / Manas Mishra6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesAustin Temple / Richard Moye vs Jeff Clay / William Burns6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2026-08-17vs Yadkin/Clay/40+6.5 ComboWon 30
W#1 DoublesDean Burkhalter / Tory Wagoner vs Chris Blankenship / Manas Mishra7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAustin Temple / Richard Moye vs Jeff Clay / David Crews2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesNathan Ayers / Matthew Whitman vs George Clutts / Donavan Hylarides6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Men 6.5 - Monday Nights
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Yadkin/Whitman/40+6.5 Combo1030121
2Yadkin/Clay/40+6.5 Combo0103635

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Dean Burkhalter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Austin Temple
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.23
Matthew Whitman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.23
Nathan Ayers
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.19
Tory Wagoner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Brad Helms
published 3.5
3.10
Drew Blackwell
published
2.50
RT Ferrell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Robert Mcouat
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nathan Ayers + Matthew Whitman4356% games+4.7% vs expected
Matthew Whitman + Tory Wagoner314 matchesnot enough data
Austin Temple + Brad Helms033 matchesnot enough data
Drew Blackwell + Tory Wagoner033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Dean Burkhalter
14W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Austin Temple
15W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
Matthew Whitman
26W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%5%95%
3.23
Nathan Ayers
23W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%5%95%
3.23
Tory Wagoner
25W–27L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%9%91%
3.19
3.5
Brad Helms
3W–5L career · no lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.12
Drew Blackwell
9W–14L career · no lines in 2026
<1%24%76%
3.10
RT Ferrell
2W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
49%51%<1%
2.50
Robert Mcouat
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.