Teams

Avalon McCarty Lites

2024 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weeknight Men · Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weeknight 4.0 Men

15 players · average NTRP 4.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-05-30vs Westwood Frank N MoleLost 01
L#1 DoublesDylan Brod / Derrick Wafford vs Dale Ennis / Dutch Jones4-6, 6-0, 0-1
2024-05-23vs Westwood GilmanWon 10
W#1 DoublesDylan Brod / Andrew Zima vs Mike Webb / James Faulstich7-5, 6-3
2024-05-16vs ACAC BardaroWon 10
W#1 SinglesDylan Brod vs David Knudson6-1, 6-3
2024-05-02vs MTC FusterWon 10
W#1 DoublesChip Gay / Dylan Brod vs Sam Kang / Yalier Fuster6-2, 7-6
2024-04-30vs Three Chopt Young's Mean MachineWon 10
W#2 DoublesChip Gay / Dylan Brod vs Ben Hall / Robert Preservati6-4, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weeknight 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Tejas Raval
published
3.90
Dylan Brod
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.77
Andrew Zima
published 4
3.71
Chip Gay
published 4
3.71
David Rathke
published 4
3.69
Thomas Leftwich
published
3.65
Nathan Maultsby
published
3.62
Derrick Wafford
published 4
3.62
Joe Lacroix
published
3.61
Jay Munya
published
3.55
Matthew Lefkowitz
published
3.40
Heath Flohre
published
3.40
Ian Shupack
published
3.32
George Brickley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chip Gay + Derrick Wafford224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tejas Raval
6W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%61%38%
3.96
4
Dylan Brod
163W–98L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
3.90
4
Andrew Zima
23W–20L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Christopher Caputo
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Chip Gay
3W–7L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.71
4
David Rathke
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.71
Thomas Leftwich
10W–8L career · no lines in 2024
9%89%1%
3.69
Nathan Maultsby
6W–11L career · no lines in 2024
15%85%1%
3.65
4
Derrick Wafford
5W–5L career · no lines in 2024
19%80%<1%
3.62
Joe Lacroix
7W–8L career · no lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.62
Jay Munya
7W–15L career · no lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.61
Matthew Lefkowitz
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
3.55
Heath Flohre
6W–11L career · no lines in 2024
77%23%<1%
3.40
Ian Shupack
14W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
3.40
George Brickley
13W–19L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.