Teams

DK/P&R/5.5Combo-Fall Ballers

OBX COMBO 18 &over · 5.5 WOMEN

11 players · average NTRP 2.67 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
W#1 DoublesDiane Klementowich / Joyce Smith vs KIMBERLY HUTTON BRICKHOUSE / Katelin Kight6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesCourtney Daniels / Jessie McClary vs Hillary Nystrom / Mica Manson6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJessica Boone / Kristi Payne vs J Kate Matzgannis / JoAnne Willis1-6, 0-6
W#1 DoublesBrie Floyd / Holly Foubister vs Betsy Williams / Mica Manson6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesSuzanne Rich / Ximena Foster vs Libby Robertson / Bonnie Midkiff6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCourtney Daniels / Jessica Rienerth vs Jill Hedges / Hillary Nystrom7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 5.5 WOMEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1DB/P&R/5.5Combo-Straight out of Love1021430
2DK/P&R/5.5Combo-Fall Ballers0112428

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.52 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.01
Brie Floyd
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.79
Joyce Smith
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.76
Jessie McClary
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.59
Diane Klementowich
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.56
Raquel Morrison
published
2.42
Sarah Wongmanee
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.39
Courtney Daniels
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.38
Holly Foubister
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.26
Ximena Foster
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.06
Jennifer Quinn
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Jessica Boone
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Diane Klementowich + Raquel Morrison4253% games+5.4% vs expected
Jennifer Quinn + Diane Klementowich3252% games+4.2% vs expected
Holly Foubister + Sarah Wongmanee224 matchesnot enough data
Jessie McClary + Joyce Smith303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Brie Floyd
57W–35L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%47%53%
3.01
Joyce Smith
24W–32L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.79
Jessie McClary
14W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
3%93%4%
2.76
2.5
Diane Klementowich
46W–35L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%25%75%
2.59
Raquel Morrison
26W–20L career · no lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
2.56
Sarah Wongmanee
24W–28L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%71%29%
2.42
2.5
Courtney Daniels
11W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%78%22%
2.39
Holly Foubister
7W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
0%80%20%
2.38
Ximena Foster
8W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.26
Jennifer Quinn
11W–44L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.06
Jessica Boone
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.