Teams

Woodcreek - Bradley

2025 SCTA Fall '24 - USTA Mixed 40 & Over · Mixed 3.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2024-11-08vs PTCTC - Dunlap/McEldoonLost 03
L#1 DoublesJohn Vickery / Lauren Terranova vs Dylan Christensen / Carol Kuehn2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJon Jeck / Nicole Kluttz vs Joseph Geter / Paula Hasberger6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRobert Bradley / Flo Bradley vs Darryl Brunk / Brooke Moore5-7, 6-7
2024-10-04vs PTCTC - Dunlap/McEldoonLost 12
L#1 DoublesRobert Bradley / Jenny Tortola vs Marc Allred / Carol Kuehn6-3, 0-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBrian Bragassa / Michelle Bragassa vs Brian Hasberger / Stacee Mceldoon7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesEric Lax / Myra Garcia vs Dylan Christensen / Paula Hasberger1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Mixed 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Lauren Terranova
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Michelle Bragassa
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Janelle Shively
published
3.19
John Vickery
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.04
Flo Bradley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Amanda Moberly
published 3
Brian Bragassa
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Eric Lax
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jenny Tortola
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jon Jeck
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Myra Garcia
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Nicole Kluttz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Phil Terranova
published
Tyson Cannon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brian Bragassa + Michelle Bragassa4155% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lauren Terranova
24W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%6%94%
3.72
Michelle Bragassa
16W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
1%85%15%
3.35
Janelle Shively
10W–8L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
John Vickery
5W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Flo Bradley
3W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%40%60%
3.04
3
Amanda Moberly
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Brian Bragassa
4W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Eric Lax
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jenny Tortola
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jon Jeck
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Myra Garcia
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Nicole Kluttz
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Phil Terranova
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Tyson Cannon
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.