Teams

Schley-Chrenka/Springdale/MRC

2024 Adult Singles 18 & Over · 3.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-01-28vs Tarnasky/Fayetteville/FACWon 21
W#1 SinglesKatherine Ferrer vs Sarah Bright5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 SinglesNur Kamilah Chrenka vs Callie Brannon6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesJeannine Wheeler vs MaryJohn Richmond3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-01-27vs Daglow-Anderson/Rogers/SVCCLost 12
W#1 SinglesLaurel Schley vs Shangwen Huang6-1, 6-0
L#2 SinglesTiffany Harris vs Piper Anderson4-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesKaylee Snell vs Gabriela Bottger2-6, 2-6
2025-01-08vs Van Schenck/Garfield/KTCLost 12
L#1 SinglesRachel Meredith vs Kelsey Sundara2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesSusan Barkley vs Elena Olson7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 SinglesKatherine Ferrer vs Meera Narayan6-2, 6-4
2024-12-19vs Luong/Rogers/SRCLost 12
L#1 SinglesJeannine Wheeler vs Brooke Redfern2-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesLaurel Schley vs Jamia Weir6-2, 6-1
L#3 SinglesRachel Meredith vs Maria Rene Arandia Jimenez1-6, 2-6
2024-11-15vs Stewart/Fayetteville/FACLost 12
L#1 SinglesKaylee Snell vs Kelly Calvert Stewart2-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesLaurel Schley vs Kimberly Brooks7-5, 6-2
L#3 SinglesTiffany Harris vs Michele Senlikci2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2024-11-12vs Daglow-Anderson/Rogers/SVCCLost 12
W#1 SinglesNur Kamilah Chrenka vs Michelle Kehoe1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 SinglesKaylee Snell vs Shangwen Huang6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 SinglesTiffany Harris vs Laurie Letts6-2, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Laurel Schley
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.50
Katherine Ferrer
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.30
Jeannine Wheeler
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.22
Nur Kamilah Chrenka
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.13
Tiffany Harris
usually #3 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
2.95
Rachel Meredith
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
Kaylee Snell
usually #3 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Susan Barkley
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laurel Schley
22W–8L career · 6 lines in 2024
15%85%<1%
3.63
Katherine Ferrer
40W–11L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%50%50%
3.50
Jeannine Wheeler
15W–8L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.30
Nur Kamilah Chrenka
17W–9L career · 4 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.22
Tiffany Harris
38W–28L career · 5 lines in 2024
15%84%<1%
3.13
Rachel Meredith
8W–10L career · 2 lines in 2024
65%35%<1%
2.95
Kaylee Snell
0W–4L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Susan Barkley
21W–8L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.