Teams

SKY RED

2023 TRIO - DEN · MEN 3.0 - TRIO

9 players · average NTRP 3.10 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-04-29vs MC REDLost 12
L#1 DoublesMarcelo Calle / Steven Mihan vs Brandon Smith / Abraham Cruz2-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesTom Parnell vs Chris Rudolph6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJohn Bringenberg / John Camins vs David Atkinson / Michael Catalano3-6, 4-6
2023-04-22vs TTA-E GREENWon 10
W#1 DoublesTom Parnell / Steven Mihan vs Joey Garcia / Robert Coates6-1, 6-3
2023-04-15vs WP YELLOWLost 03
L#1 DoublesMarcelo Calle / John Camins vs Jeffrey Merman / Talwin Filholm0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesEric Brummond vs Guy LaRosa5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesChris Murphy / Mark Jewell vs Brad Webb / Mark Anderson0-6, 0-6
2023-04-08vs TTA-E REDSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAaron Duke / Chris Murphy vs Greg Fossen / Jonathan Anderson6-1, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesEric Brummond / Mark Nelson vs David Daley / Jay Bat-Itgel6-3, 7-5
2023-04-01vs NJ REDLost 01
L#1 SinglesJohn Bringenberg vs Gregg Occhiogrosso0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.0 - TRIO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Tom Parnell
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.27
Steven Mihan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.94
Aaron Duke
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.84
John Camins
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Chris Murphy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.63
Eric Brummond
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.50
Mark Jewell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.43
Marcelo Calle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
John Bringenberg
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Steven Mihan + Aaron Duke4168% games+10.0% vs expected
Chris Murphy + Mark Jewell2736% games−11.8% vs expected
Chris Murphy + Aaron Duke033 matchesnot enough data
Chris Murphy + John Camins033 matchesnot enough data
Chris Murphy + John Bringenberg123 matchesnot enough data
Steven Mihan + John Camins213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tom Parnell
77W–30L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%88%11%
3.34
3.5
Steven Mihan
68W–30L career · 2 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
3
Aaron Duke
45W–23L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%66%34%
2.94
3
John Camins
35W–61L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%89%10%
2.84
3
Chris Murphy
41W–79L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Eric Brummond
26W–36L career · type S · 2 lines in 2023
16%84%<1%
2.63
Mark Jewell
8W–29L career · 1 line in 2023
50%50%<1%
2.50
Marcelo Calle
5W–34L career · 2 lines in 2023
71%29%<1%
2.43
John Bringenberg
3W–31L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.