Teams

Chapman/Partagas/Halvorsen 65s 6.5 Combo W Mon AM

2024 Piedmont Combo 65 & Over · 6.5 Women 65 & Over

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 6.5 Women 65 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Margaret Reynolds
published
3.30
Lynn Tester
published
3.29
Judy Eaton
published
3.24
Patty Dutton
published
3.17
Michelle Harris
published
2.94
2.94
Patricia Barman
published
2.86
Betty Smith
published 3
2.85
Ila Rosenthal
published 3
2.83
Linda Chapman
published
2.80
Faye Halvorsen
published 3
Debra Elium
published 3
2.65
Mariann Van Ryen
published
2.47
Rose Chrismon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Harris + Patricia Barman033 matchesnot enough data
Linda Chapman + Faye Halvorsen033 matchesnot enough data
Linda Chapman + Patty Dutton123 matchesnot enough data
Margaret Reynolds + Patricia Barman303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Margaret Reynolds
13W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
3.38
Lynn Tester
17W–9L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.30
Judy Eaton
39W–21L career · no lines in 2024
1%94%5%
3.29
Patty Dutton
19W–23L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%2%
3.24
Michelle Harris
19W–17L career · no lines in 2024
<1%10%90%
3.17
3
Elizabeth Deterding
14W–15L career · no lines in 2024
<1%67%32%
2.94
Patricia Barman
13W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%68%32%
2.94
3
Betty Smith
9W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%86%14%
2.86
3
Ila Rosenthal
11W–15L career · no lines in 2024
<1%88%12%
2.85
Linda Chapman
8W–15L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
2.83
3
Faye Halvorsen
16W–10L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Debra Elium
2W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Mariann Van Ryen
121W–99L career · no lines in 2024
13%87%<1%
2.65
Rose Chrismon
3W–26L career · no lines in 2024
60%40%<1%
2.47

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.