Teams

YMCA Mt. Brook - Dasher

2025 B'ham Fall - Adult 40 & Over Weekday Women · 3.0 Women Friday - Partial Round Robin

9 players · average NTRP 3.30 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-11-15vs West Homewood - Daugherty/PriceWon 30
W#1 DoublesNital Patel / Stephanie Lott vs Jennifer Chadha / Holly Daugherty6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDaniela Barber / Natalie Markham vs Sally Hoerner / Stacy Ezell6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAmy Coker / Elizabeth Humphreys vs Mary Lynn Warren / Abnous Samford6-3, 6-3
2024-11-01vs Lifetime - HammontreeWon 31
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Humphreys / Stephanie Lott vs Kim Beck / Deanna Reynolds6-1, 6-4
L#1 SinglesNatalie Markham vs Lorena Diaz2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesDaniela Barber / Brandi Dasher vs Susan Hammontree / Hiroko Mitsuta6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesNital Patel / Amy Swindle-English vs Alessia Anella / Erica Faircloth4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2024-10-25vs West Homewood - Hollis/DrakeSplit 22
W#1 DoublesAmy Coker / Elizabeth Humphreys vs Katy Bishop / Laura Smith6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesAmy Swindle-English vs Ann Wade Shreve0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesNatalie Markham / Rosemary Alexander vs Lexi Ginsburg / Lauren Calagaz4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesDaniela Barber / Brandi Dasher vs Caroline Dunavant / Cassandra Hall6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2024-10-18vs Greystone CC - WheelerWon 40
W#1 DoublesRosemary Alexander / Daniela Barber vs LeAnne Kahn / Stacey Knouse6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesNatalie Markham vs Anne McGavin6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAmy Coker / Elizabeth Humphreys vs Joni Wheeler / Angela Moore6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLacey Amos / Nital Patel vs Kelley Brown / Ashley David6-0, 6-2
2024-10-04vs Greystone - EarlsSplit 22
L#1 DoublesDaniela Barber / Amy Coker vs Stevie Earls / Sims Holt4-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesNital Patel vs Marla Lahey4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Humphreys / Natalie Markham vs Susan Hays / Christina Shoemaker7-6, 6-1
L#3 DoublesStephanie Lott / Rosemary Alexander vs Elizabeth Fisher / Niki May6-7, 6-7
2024-09-27vs HCC - Richard (Friday)Won 31
L#1 DoublesCelia Nadler / Amy Swindle-English vs Stacy Moore / Melissa Walker-Simmons1-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesDaniela Barber vs Lena Martinez6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAmy Coker / Nital Patel vs Kelly Connelly / Courtney Richard6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRosemary Alexander / Stephanie Lott vs Michelle Watts / Cameron Shaqar6-3, 6-4
2024-09-20vs BHRC - GravesWon 40
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Humphreys / Nital Patel vs Evalyn Council / Beverly Thomas6-2, 6-0
W#1 SinglesNatalie Markham vs Ragan Overby6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLacey Amos / Daniela Barber vs Leah Doss / Ginger Graves6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesRosemary Alexander / Stephanie Lott vs Courtney Pigford / Jessica Johnson6-0, 6-0
2024-09-13vs West Homewood - Hughes/OwenWon 40
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Humphreys / Natalie Markham vs Abbey Sheehan / Lauren Denton6-1, 6-4
W#1 SinglesNital Patel vs Sarah Cascio6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesDaniela Barber / Amy Coker vs Deana Hughes / Jodi McDuff6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesStephanie Lott / Celia Nadler vs Jenni Falkner / Holly Stiles6-1, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women Friday - Partial Round Robin have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Daniela Barber
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.56
Nital Patel
usually #3 Doubles 29%, also #1 Singles 29% · published
3.37
Elizabeth Humphreys
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.18
Natalie Markham
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
3.14
Stephanie Lott
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.90
Celia Nadler
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
Brandi Dasher
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.66
Amy Swindle-English
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
Lacey Amos
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brandi Dasher + Daniela Barber4165% games+11.0% vs expected
Daniela Barber + Nital Patel5063% games+7.6% vs expected
Natalie Markham + Daniela Barber314 matchesnot enough data
Natalie Markham + Elizabeth Humphreys404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Daniela Barber
59W–16L career · 8 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.71
Nital Patel
58W–15L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%33%67%
3.56
3.5
Elizabeth Humphreys
33W–10L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%84%16%
3.37
Natalie Markham
25W–17L career · 7 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.18
Stephanie Lott
20W–9L career · 6 lines in 2025
14%86%<1%
3.14
3
Celia Nadler
36W–42L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
2.90
3
Brandi Dasher
8W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Amy Swindle-English
9W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
10%89%<1%
2.66
Lacey Amos
7W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.