Teams

Scared Hitless

2025 COMBO · 7.5 Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.75 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-04-12vs The Legendary BanditsLost 03
L#1 DoublesKarl Tell / Daniel Casanova vs Peter Trang / David Perales3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesHiram Chavez / Mariano Molina vs Lee Seidlits / Michael Small5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesBryan Tran / Ryan McLaughlin vs Anthony Rocco-Frank / Elkin Echeverri7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2025-04-11vs SA-Slam 2.1Lost 12
W#1 DoublesJason Dudley / Mariano Molina vs Chris Vaughn / Aaron Schimmoller4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBryan Tran / Ryan McLaughlin vs MIGUEL RIVAS / Stuart Bryan2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesRolando Cantu / Ernesto Elizondo vs Troy Bolton / Austin Weeks0-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.13
Jeff Riddle
published
3.98
Hiram Chavez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.89
Juan Arriaga
published
3.88
Bryan Tran
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.85
Randall Andrews
published
3.84
Jaime Medina
published
3.79
Rolando Cantu
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.77
Karl Tell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.62
Phillip Zook
published
3.45
Daniel Casanova
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.31
Ernesto Elizondo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Roland Deleon
published
Mariano Molina
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rolando Cantu + Randall Andrews8353% games−1.3% vs expected
Roland Deleon + Jaime Medina213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jeff Riddle
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%17%83%
4.13
Hiram Chavez
19W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%56%44%
3.98
Juan Arriaga
15W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.89
4
Bryan Tran
10W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.88
Randall Andrews
17W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%14%
3.85
Jaime Medina
14W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.84
Rolando Cantu
15W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
3.79
Karl Tell
13W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
Phillip Zook
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.62
3.5
Daniel Casanova
22W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
3.45
Ernesto Elizondo
4W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Roland Deleon
31W–33L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Mariano Molina
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.