Teams

1. Jan

2025 Virginia Credit Holding Area · Credit Issued

22 players · average NTRP 3.36 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Credit Issued have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Nick Yang
published
3.72
3.60
Jill Poretz
published 4
3.42
Caixia Che
published 3.5
3.38
Maureen Bornholdt
published 3.5
3.33
Denny Nelson
published 3.5
3.32
Gillian Moorhead
published 3.5
3.30
John Martin
published
3.29
Kristin Gibbs
published
3.27
Karen Hodges
published
3.23
Laurie Peacock
published 3.5
3.08
Jia Li
published
2.92
Elyse Stooks
published
2.87
JEANETTE SARAIVA
published 3
2.78
Sammy Himmelsteib
published
2.68
Mikhail Velasco
published 3
2.59
Leigh McLister
published 3
2.47
Wendy Stone
published
2.29
Sarah Icore
published 2.5
Elisabeth Wessels
published
Joe Bhaktiar
published
Na Liu
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maureen Bornholdt + Jill Poretz4353% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nick Yang
31W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
3.98
4
Kimberlee Overdeck
81W–132L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Jill Poretz
305W–215L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.60
3.5
Caixia Che
87W–47L career · no lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.42
3.5
Maureen Bornholdt
72W–133L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Denny Nelson
11W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Gillian Moorhead
168W–147L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
John Martin
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
92%8%<1%
3.30
Kristin Gibbs
9W–9L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.29
Karen Hodges
7W–6L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Laurie Peacock
39W–60L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%2%
3.23
Jia Li
3W–8L career · no lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.08
Elyse Stooks
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
2.92
3
JEANETTE SARAIVA
65W–43L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.87
Sammy Himmelsteib
7W–9L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Mikhail Velasco
42W–52L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Leigh McLister
22W–28L career · no lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
2.59
Wendy Stone
2W–17L career · no lines in 2025
60%40%<1%
2.47
2.5
Sarah Icore
46W–59L career · no lines in 2025
0%94%6%
2.29
Elisabeth Wessels
16W–12L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Joe Bhaktiar
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Na Liu
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.