Teams

Em.Johnson18S

2024 Capital Singles 18 & Over · 4.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.86 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-07-26vs Me.Golder18SWon 20
W#1 SinglesDeno Fonville vs Stephanie Whiting7-5, 7-5
W#2 SinglesRachael Kiker vs Jordan Fieldstein6-2, 6-2
2024-06-20vs De.Lape18SLost 01
L#2 SinglesLisa Kempf vs Nancy Pack3-6, 0-6
2024-06-18vs Ma.Altneu18SWon 20
W#1 SinglesRachael Kiker vs Lindsay Murdock7-6, 6-3
W#3 SinglesLisa Kempf vs Amanda Lindsay6-2, 7-6
2024-06-13vs Sk.Poole18SLost 01
L#2 SinglesDeno Fonville vs Anne Free4-6, 1-6
2024-05-30vs Er.McAllister18SWon 20
W#1 SinglesDeno Fonville vs Meagan Rietz4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 SinglesRachael Kiker vs Caroline Marks Stevenson6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.81 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.19
Allison Graves
published 4.5
4.01
Rachael Kiker
usually #3 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.85
Christina Jenkins
published 3.5
3.80
Deno Fonville
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
Erika Grenier
published 4
3.63
Elise Hamilton
published 3.5
3.39
Lisa Kempf
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Kempf + Elise Hamilton2347% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Allison Graves
38W–20L career · no lines in 2024
7%92%1%
4.19
4
Rachael Kiker
164W–91L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%48%52%
4.01
3.5
Christina Jenkins
36W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%<1%>99%
3.85
4
Deno Fonville
132W–132L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Erika Grenier
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Elise Hamilton
38W–16L career · no lines in 2024
<1%16%84%
3.63
3.5
Lisa Kempf
367W–302L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
3.39

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.