Teams

RCSP Price

2025 Pinellas Adult 40 & Over Spring · 4.0 M Saturday

10 players · average NTRP 3.88 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-06-14vs Pinellas/Rattner/40&Over4.0MLost 01
L#2 DoublesKoray Yilmaz / Scott Rogers vs Steven Rattner / Mark Reagan7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2025-05-17vs Seminole Lake Dsa 4.0 MWon 10
W#1 DoublesKoray Yilmaz / Thomas Gross vs Randall Meisner / Brian Cooper6-0, 6-4
2025-05-10vs Seminole Lake Dsa 4.0 MWon 10
W#3 DoublesGreg Bulleit / Koray Yilmaz vs Ken Ianni / Dane Houston6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2025-05-03vs McMullen CribbLost 01
L#2 DoublesEric Shapiro / Koray Yilmaz vs Colin Fitzgearl / Kevin Burnett3-6, 6-7
2025-04-26vs Pinellas/Rattner/40&Over4.0MWon 10
W#3 DoublesEric Shapiro / Koray Yilmaz vs Christopher Hollingsworth / Steven Rattner6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-04-19vs Seminole Lake Dsa 4.0 MSplit 11
W#2 DoublesKoray Yilmaz / Eric Shapiro vs Steven Dominie / Dane Houston6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBrent Litwak / Greg Bulleit vs Chuck Goldberg / Brian Cooper3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-04-05vs Pinellas/Rattner/40&Over4.0MLost 01
L#3 DoublesJoe Faraci / Brent Litwak vs Bill Calafiura / Brian Williams1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 M Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Brian Stone
published 4
3.75
Lance Hill
published
3.74
Koray Yilmaz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.71
James Price
published
3.66
Cameron Carr
published 4
3.61
Thomas Gross
published
3.56
Brent Litwak
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.55
Joe Faraci
published
Douglas Hicks
published
Kevin Fantauzzo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Koray Yilmaz + James Price033 matchesnot enough data
Koray Yilmaz + Brent Litwak303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brian Stone
26W–20L career · no lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.93
Lance Hill
11W–8L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
4
Koray Yilmaz
148W–84L career · 6 lines in 2025
4%92%3%
3.74
James Price
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.71
4
Cameron Carr
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
13%87%1%
3.66
Thomas Gross
4W–11L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.61
3.5
Brent Litwak
69W–39L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%33%67%
3.56
Joe Faraci
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.55
Douglas Hicks
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kevin Fantauzzo
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.