Teams

Essex - SHL

2026 Escambia Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-06-17vs McElhany - PCCLost 01
L#1 DoublesSusan Bonsignore / Cheryl Vann vs Stephanie Boll / Jessica Lazzarino2-6, 3-6
2026-06-08Won 10
W#1 SinglesAshley Gruber vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-06-08vs Tan - SHLWon 10
W#2 DoublesSusan Bonsignore / Dana Persons vs Cherie Tan / Jessica Gonterman7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2026-05-18vs Nguyen - RS ClayLost 01
L#1 DoublesKlara Szalai / Theresa Smith vs Jennifer Capozzoli / Tanya Hughes3-6, 1-6
2026-05-05vs Bryan - RS ClayLost 01
L#2 DoublesTheresa Smith / Kim Gall vs Gina O'Neill / Camille Neuner5-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
Ashley Gruber
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Dana Persons
published 3.5
3.14
Carol Essex
published 3.5
3.12
Kim Gall
published
3.11
Susan Bonsignore
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.10
Susan Rice
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
Cheryl Vann
published 3.5
2.99
Sissy Ford
published
2.98
Theresa Smith
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.96
Klara Szalai
published
2.95
Katie Hovanec
published
2.94
Barbie Doherty
published 3.5
2.93
Tori Baker
published
2.89
Julie Reed
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Reed + Tori Baker213 matchesnot enough data
Carol Essex + Dana Persons213 matchesnot enough data
Klara Szalai + Barbie Doherty033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ashley Gruber
4W–6L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Dana Persons
9W–8L career · no lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Carol Essex
4W–4L career · no lines in 2026
16%84%1%
3.14
Kim Gall
3W–4L career · no lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.12
Susan Bonsignore
98W–94L career · 2 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.11
Susan Rice
27W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%25%75%
3.10
3.5
Cheryl Vann
18W–11L career · no lines in 2026
43%56%<1%
3.02
Sissy Ford
9W–10L career · no lines in 2026
53%47%<1%
2.99
Theresa Smith
4W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
56%44%<1%
2.98
Klara Szalai
4W–9L career · no lines in 2026
60%40%<1%
2.96
Katie Hovanec
0W–3L career · no lines in 2026
63%37%<1%
2.95
3.5
Barbie Doherty
0W–8L career · no lines in 2026
67%33%<1%
2.94
Tori Baker
3W–3L career · no lines in 2026
69%31%<1%
2.93
Julie Reed
3W–1L career · no lines in 2026
78%22%<1%
2.89

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.