Teams

Heritage Bay - K. Keillor

2021 Collier Adult 55 & Over Winter · Adult 55 & Over 6.0 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.17 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
W#1 DoublesCheryl Copps / Kate Keillor vs Linda Kelly / Trish Zimbalatti6-3, 6-1
2021-03-05Won 20
W#1 DoublesCheryl Copps / Julie Kwiatkowski vs Christi Krieger / Kristi Mann6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesGreta Corcoran / Kate Keillor vs Mary Swinson Brown / Priscilla Ragonese6-3, 0-6, 1-0
2021-02-26vs Bay Colony - B. AllenLost 01
L#1 DoublesCheryl Copps / Monique Berlinger vs Laurie Hanson / Marci Fisher3-6, 4-6
2021-02-19vs Collier - Marco YMCA - SchaufusLost 02
L#1 DoublesMaureen Rennie / Cheryl Copps vs Jan Jackman / Jodi Schaufus4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesPeggy Garrity / Kate Keillor vs Ana Cecilia Isaza / Sally Mattke2-6, 0-6
2021-02-12Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKate Keillor / Monique Berlinger vs Leslie Vanderhorst / GEORGETTE HEERWAGEN5-7, 3-6
W#1 DoublesKate Keillor / Cheryl Copps vs Jamey Moore / Linda Kelly6-3, 6-3
2021-01-29Won 10
W#1 DoublesKate Keillor / Maureen Rennie vs Kristi Mann / Christi Krieger1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2021-01-22vs Bay Colony - B. AllenWon 10
W#1 DoublesKate Keillor / Cheryl Copps vs Carla Kretschmann / Marci Fisher6-2, 6-4
2021-01-15vs Collier - Marco YMCA - SchaufusSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMaureen Rennie / Kate Keillor vs Jan Jackman / Jodi Schaufus6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCheryl Copps / Liudmila Polonskaya vs Ana Cecilia Isaza / Pattie Yergler6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2021-01-08vs Quail West - HeerwagenWon 10
W#1 DoublesCheryl Copps / Maureen Rennie vs Roxana Scott / GEORGETTE HEERWAGEN6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over 6.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.13
Camille Vaccari
published 3.5
3.07
Maureen Rennie
published
2.94
Cheryl Copps
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 3
2.93
Monique Berlinger
published
2.71
Kate Keillor
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.51
Roya Nouhi
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cheryl Copps + Kate Keillor182849% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Camille Vaccari
6W–11L career · no lines in 2021
16%83%<1%
3.13
Maureen Rennie
0W–5L career · no lines in 2021
30%70%<1%
3.07
3
Cheryl Copps
235W–133L career · 8 lines in 2021
<1%69%31%
2.94
Monique Berlinger
14W–9L career · no lines in 2021
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Kate Keillor
171W–148L career · 8 lines in 2021
5%93%1%
2.71
Roya Nouhi
5W–7L career · no lines in 2021
48%52%<1%
2.51

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.