Teams

Vissering

2023 Coppermine Mixed 18 & Over · Coppermine Mixed 18 & Over 9.0

12 players · average NTRP 4.70 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-05-20vs 9.0 Der CoppermineSplit 11
W#2 DoublesMargie Davis / Jonathan Vissering vs Megan Hansen / Ian Hansen4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDao Phan-Vissering / Tim Huber vs Arina Kravitz / Koby Bonta6-7, 2-6
2023-05-14Won 10
W#3 DoublesEve Helmer / Matthew Geppi vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-05-13vs 9.0 Der CoppermineWon 20
W#2 DoublesEve Helmer / Tim Huber vs Megan Hansen / Ian Hansen6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSimone Feldman / Jonathan Vissering vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-05-07vs 9.0 Der CoppermineSplit 11
L#2 DoublesJonathan Vissering / Simone Feldman vs Jean Lim / Henry McVeigh3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesMatthew Geppi / Jennifer Nyman vs Anne Tobin / Koby Bonta6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2023-04-16vs 9.0 Der CoppermineLost 01
L#2 DoublesChris Miller / Dao Phan-Vissering vs Koby Bonta / Anne Tobin2-6, 5-7
2023-04-15vs 9.0 Der CoppermineLost 01
L#1 DoublesTerrance Scott / Dao Phan-Vissering vs Henry McVeigh / Anne Tobin1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Coppermine Mixed 18 & Over 9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.34 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.80
Angel Batkins
published 5
4.49
Eve Helmer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 5
4.37
Matthew Geppi
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.33
Margie Davis
published
4.23
Simone Feldman
published
4.19
Jonathan Vissering
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.96
Dao Phan-Vissering
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
Hayan Marouf
published
Hung Nguyen
published
Jennifer Nyman
published
Jessica Lee
published
Tim Huber
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jonathan Vissering + Dao Phan-Vissering81150% gamesnot enough data
Matthew Geppi + Eve Helmer5170% gamesnot enough data
Jonathan Vissering + Eve Helmer5063% gamesnot enough data
Matthew Geppi + Dao Phan-Vissering404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Angel Batkins
13W–7L career · no lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.80
5
Eve Helmer
276W–134L career · type D · 2 lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.49
4.5
Matthew Geppi
225W–81L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%82%17%
4.37
Margie Davis
36W–18L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
4.33
Simone Feldman
78W–66L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
4.23
4.5
Jonathan Vissering
357W–182L career · 3 lines in 2023
9%90%1%
4.19
4.5
Dao Phan-Vissering
232W–271L career · 3 lines in 2023
62%38%<1%
3.96
Hayan Marouf
10W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Hung Nguyen
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jennifer Nyman
8W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jessica Lee
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tim Huber
6W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.