Teams

BAY CLUB ROSS VALLEY CW6.5A

2025 COMBO · Women 6.5

30 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-11-01vs PIONEER PK CW6.5ALost 12
W#1 DoublesLeesa Gliebe / Maureen Sampson vs Elizabeth Ford / Jane Jiang6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesSara Barker / Jen Reidy vs Amanda Mccarthy / Bernadette McCarthy3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesNeha Pyle / Kathryn Supinski vs Mina Solemani / Richi Tamba1-6, 4-6
2025-09-18vs PIONEER PK CW6.5AWon 30
W#1 DoublesSara Barker / Corey Stodolnic vs Anna Le / Mina Solemani7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesFariba Monsefi / Tonia Rhoads vs Karen Mangan / Amanda Mccarthy6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesTricia Ghalam / Mandy Campbell vs Dominique Audet / Dana Gray6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 29 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Maureen Sampson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.64
Mandy Campbell
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.56
Melissa Vincelette
published
3.47
Lisa Bridges
published
3.44
Caroline Bruister
published 3.5
3.39
Alexandra Wlassowsky
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.39
Jennifer Tetrick
published
3.35
Jeanne Hoffman
published
3.33
Betsy Gozzi
published 3.5
3.32
Katie Ives
published
3.29
Kristi Burlingame
published
3.22
Fariba Monsefi
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Neha Pyle
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Kelli Radcliffe
published
3.12
Tricia Ghalam
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Corey Stodolnic
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.08
Tonia Rhoads
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.05
Teresa Martinique Kelley
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.05
Elizabeth Koch
published 3
3.04
Katie Levine
published
3.03
Stefanie Weinstein
published
3.01
Laurie Aaronson
published
2.98
Anisha Jagtap
published 3
2.98
Ellen Taylor
published 3.5
2.93
Kathryn Supinski
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Sara Barker
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.83
Jen Reidy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.74
Leesa Gliebe
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.64
Ann Cleveland
published 3
Sarah Gouveia
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alexandra Wlassowsky + Jennifer Tetrick314 matchesnot enough data
Caroline Bruister + Jennifer Tetrick404 matchesnot enough data
Jen Reidy + Kristi Burlingame033 matchesnot enough data
Sara Barker + Teresa Martinique Kelley123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Maureen Sampson
15W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.88
Mandy Campbell
29W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%15%85%
3.64
Melissa Vincelette
13W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%32%68%
3.56
Lisa Bridges
10W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.47
3.5
Caroline Bruister
16W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.44
3.5
Alexandra Wlassowsky
16W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.39
Jennifer Tetrick
26W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.39
Jeanne Hoffman
10W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%86%13%
3.35
3.5
Betsy Gozzi
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.33
Katie Ives
13W–3L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.32
Kristi Burlingame
12W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Fariba Monsefi
5W–7L career · type A · 1 line in 2025
5%94%2%
3.22
Neha Pyle
2W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
5%94%1%
3.21
Kelli Radcliffe
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
10%90%1%
3.17
Tricia Ghalam
10W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.12
3.5
Corey Stodolnic
3W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.08
Tonia Rhoads
4W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.08
Teresa Martinique Kelley
14W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
3.05
3
Elizabeth Koch
9W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
3.05
Katie Levine
2W–8L career · no lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
3.04
Stefanie Weinstein
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.03
Laurie Aaronson
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
46%54%<1%
3.01
3
Anisha Jagtap
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
2.98
3.5
Ellen Taylor
3W–10L career · no lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
2.98
Kathryn Supinski
0W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
71%29%<1%
2.93
Sara Barker
6W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
2.92
Jen Reidy
4W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
91%9%<1%
2.83
Leesa Gliebe
4W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Ann Cleveland
3W–16L career · no lines in 2025
14%86%<1%
2.64
Sarah Gouveia
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.