Teams

Blanton/Memphiis

2024 Adult 18 & Over Early Start League - Memphis · 3.0 Women

16 players · average NTRP 2.75 / TENNESSEE

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings18 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Grady Memphis8032818240
2Alexander/Memphis6024615178
3Day/Memphis62301024272
4Mendoza/Memphis62291130278
5Lacy/Memphis62221842317
6Owens/Memphis53231740320
7Flesch/Memphis42191124217
8Campbell/Memphis44221840334
9Nabors/Memphis44192147368
10Nair/ Memphis35192145363
11Lewis/Memphis35162451390
12Cignetti/Memphis35162458432
13Rowe/Memphis24111942289
14Carpenter/Memphis26142655402
15Powell/Memphis17132758412
16Donahue/Memphis17103065412
17Slater/memphis17103065424
18Blanton/Memphiis0632756348

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.50 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.78
Salina Xu
published
Cyndie Fogarty
published 3
2.71
Ellen Vannucci
published 3
2.65
Lora Bridgewater
published
2.60
Susan Kruchten
published
2.54
Kristy Richardson
published
2.52
Marie Murrah
published
2.51
Abigail Cardwell
published 2.5
2.47
WENDY Vines
published
2.45
Karen Hamburger
published
2.40
Cheryl Patterson
published 3
2.39
Beverly Kimbrough
published 2.5
2.28
Renee DeGutis
published
2.15
Amelia Blanton
published 2.5
Jenny Howell
published
Trish Kennedy
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Kruchten + Kristy Richardson6744% games−2.7% vs expected
Renee DeGutis + Beverly Kimbrough4547% games−4.5% vs expected
Lora Bridgewater + Cheryl Patterson01028% games−17.6% vs expected
Renee DeGutis + Amelia Blanton3256% gamesnot enough data
Karen Hamburger + Beverly Kimbrough224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Salina Xu
25W–43L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%5%
2.78
3
Cyndie Fogarty
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Ellen Vannucci
8W–10L career · no lines in 2024
5%93%1%
2.71
Lora Bridgewater
2W–18L career · no lines in 2024
>99%<1%<1%
2.65
Susan Kruchten
12W–15L career · no lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
2.60
Kristy Richardson
11W–14L career · no lines in 2024
38%62%<1%
2.54
Marie Murrah
7W–11L career · no lines in 2024
44%55%<1%
2.52
2.5
Abigail Cardwell
8W–13L career · no lines in 2024
0%47%53%
2.51
WENDY Vines
52W–79L career · no lines in 2024
0%59%41%
2.47
Karen Hamburger
10W–8L career · no lines in 2024
0%64%36%
2.45
3
Cheryl Patterson
0W–24L career · no lines in 2024
78%22%<1%
2.40
2.5
Beverly Kimbrough
14W–15L career · no lines in 2024
0%81%19%
2.39
Renee DeGutis
13W–34L career · no lines in 2024
0%95%5%
2.28
2.5
Amelia Blanton
11W–21L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.15
Jenny Howell
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Trish Kennedy
12W–11L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.