Teams

Yates 6.5 Combo 40s Thurs

2023 Piedmont Combo 40 & Over · 6.5 Women 40 & Over

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-09-28vs Crawford 6.5 Combo 40s ThursWon 10
W#3 DoublesSerena Igharas / Rebecca Morrison vs Sue O'Shaughnessy / Brandye Peterson6-1, 6-0
2023-08-19vs Goy 6.5 Combo 40s ThursLost 01
L#1 DoublesSerena Igharas / Samantha Price vs Jennifer Tewksbury / Blythe Murphy1-6, 2-6
2023-08-10vs Greene 6.5 Combo 40s ThursWon 10
W#3 DoublesMeghan Flynn / Serena Igharas vs Melanie Miller / Linda Shuster6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
Alina Vannavong
published 3.5
3.40
Patty Craig
published
3.32
3.32
Serena Igharas
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.22
Samantha Price
published
3.21
Stephanie Gilmer
published
3.20
Kelly Guyler
published
3.04
Jennifer Yates
published
2.94
Shannon Roley
published
2.87
Rebecca Morrison
published
2.77
Meghan Flynn
published
Kim Kyle
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Alina Vannavong
57W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%17%83%
3.62
Patty Craig
33W–22L career · no lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Christina Schulenklopper
18W–13L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Serena Igharas
149W–124L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.32
Samantha Price
22W–27L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.22
Stephanie Gilmer
11W–25L career · no lines in 2023
5%93%1%
3.21
Kelly Guyler
31W–20L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.20
Jennifer Yates
8W–28L career · no lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
3.04
Shannon Roley
13W–22L career · no lines in 2023
<1%69%31%
2.94
Rebecca Morrison
14W–21L career · no lines in 2023
<1%84%15%
2.87
Meghan Flynn
18W–37L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
2.77
Kim Kyle
2W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.