← Teams

SAC-Natarajan

2023 Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.79 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Deepak Selvanathan
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 4
3.60
Eddie Shin
published 4
3.53
Matt Zhou
usually #1 Doubles 42%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.53
Mitchell Whitehurst
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.50
Vimal Natarajan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.50
Eric Means
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.40
Srinivasa Kanamatha
usually #1 Doubles 82%, also #1 Singles 12% · published 3.5
—
Brady Berry
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 0
Results9 ties
2023-03-19Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesDeepak Selvanathan / Srinivasa Kanamatha vs Matthew Trank / Mark Stephenson6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAjay Kumar Tippisetti / Brady Berry vs Jae Joon Kang / Noah Trubo0-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-03-04Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesDeepak Selvanathan / Srinivasa Kanamatha vs Mark King / Willis Boyer3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesVimal Natarajan / Eric Means vs William Malloch / Brent Grubb2-6, 7-5, 1-0
2023-02-26Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesSrinivasa Kanamatha / Deepak Selvanathan vs Tin Duong / Minh Nguyen3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesVimal Natarajan / Ajay Kumar Tippisetti vs Desarom Teso / Michael Won6-3, 7-6
L#3 DoublesMatt Zhou / Brady Berry vs Kevin Phan / Tyler Phengsynath6-4, 6-2
2023-02-19Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesDeepak Selvanathan / Dao Her vs Patrick Trank / Mark Stephenson4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMatt Zhou / Mitchell Whitehurst vs Jason Crawford / Russ DeMoss7-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesVimal Natarajan / Ajay Kumar Tippisetti vs Noah Trubo / William Anderson6-3, 6-3
2023-02-05Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesSrinivasa Kanamatha / Deepak Selvanathan vs Donald Brenneman / Bill Henderson7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDao Her / Mitchell Whitehurst vs Reza Kafi / Todd Eckelman6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesVimal Natarajan / Eric Means vs Christian Casebeer / Kit Johnson2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-01-29Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesDeepak Selvanathan / Srinivasa Kanamatha vs Louis Wheatley / Emil Tsao6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMatt Zhou / Mitchell Whitehurst vs Andy Bracken / Alexander Kahle2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesVimal Natarajan / Eric Means vs Peter Singson / Huy Bui7-5, 6-3
2023-01-28Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesDeepak Selvanathan / Srinivasa Kanamatha vs John Major / Patrick Brewer6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMatt Zhou / Mitchell Whitehurst vs Donald Pettitt / Steve Scharfstein6-2, 6-0
2023-01-08Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesVimal Natarajan / Srinivasa Kanamatha vs Jonathan Hong / Saurabh Chauhan6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDeepak Selvanathan / Mitchell Whitehurst vs Frank Shen / Jacob Velasco6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMatt Zhou / Brady Berry vs Jordan Keomanivanh / Adam Oken4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-12-09Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesMitchell Whitehurst / Teresa Sullivan vs William Creger / Ellen Mader6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Deepak Selvanathan
64W–74L career
1%95%4%
3.83
4
Eddie Shin
44W–16L career
14%86%0%
3.60
3.5
Matt Zhou
63W–65L career
0%73%27%
3.53
3.5
Mitchell Whitehurst
90W–77L career
0%76%24%
3.53
4
Vimal Natarajan
78W–95L career
34%66%0%
3.50
4
Eric Means
26W–48L career
36%64%0%
3.50
3.5
Srinivasa Kanamatha
75W–55L career
0%95%5%
3.40
0
Brady Berry
56W–45L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.