Teams

AL/Reasner

2025 Adult 70 & Over Multi-State Championship · 3.5 Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.42 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-05-03vs AR/Richard/CLRWon 30
W#1 DoublesT Thompson / Gary Irwin vs Anthony Kovacevic / Terry Richard6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDennis Reasner / Daniel Fulton vs Jim Winter / Steve Cousins6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesChuck Lamar / Fred Burkert vs Michael Fisher / Mark Stewart6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2025-05-03vs GA/ElliottWon 21
W#1 DoublesGeoffrey Haynes / Richard Salling vs Robert Anderson / C Moss4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDennis Reasner / Daniel Fulton vs Robert Elliott / Mark Gottlieb6-4, 7-6
L#3 DoublesChuck Lamar / Fred Burkert vs Russ Gresham / Dave Tipton3-6, 4-6
2025-05-02vs MS/Byrd/Gulf CoastLost 12
W#1 DoublesT Thompson / Gary Irwin vs William Wilburn / Terry Gene Cook6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesGeoffrey Haynes / Richard Salling vs John Wilkinson / Hap Davis6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesFred Burkert / Daniel Fulton vs David Stanovich / Ron Carstens2-6, 5-7
2025-05-01vs OK/Dollmann/TulsaLost 12
L#1 DoublesT Thompson / Gary Irwin vs Wayne Burnham / Bob Mason1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRichard Salling / Geoffrey Haynes vs Dennis Morris / Gary Bryant5-7, 6-7
W#3 DoublesDennis Reasner / Daniel Fulton vs Steven Dollmann / Greg Smith6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.28
T Thompson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Daniel Fulton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Gary Irwin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Dennis Reasner
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.12
Geoffrey Haynes
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.10
Chuck Lamar
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.91
Fred Burkert
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Richard Salling
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Travis Hulsey
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dennis Reasner + Fred Burkert224 matchesnot enough data
Gary Irwin + T Thompson224 matchesnot enough data
Geoffrey Haynes + Richard Salling123 matchesnot enough data
Fred Burkert + Chuck Lamar123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

T Thompson
28W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Daniel Fulton
5W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Gary Irwin
22W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Dennis Reasner
26W–48L career · 3 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.12
3.5
Geoffrey Haynes
9W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Chuck Lamar
34W–75L career · 2 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.10
3
Fred Burkert
28W–52L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
2.91
Richard Salling
8W–23L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Travis Hulsey
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.