Teams

HCC - D. Agnew

2025 Hillsborough Adult 55 & Over · 9.0 Adult 55 & Over - Women

9 players · average NTRP 4.25 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-03-22vs Hills/Roset/55&Over9.0WLost 01
L#2 DoublesDenise Agnew / Lisa Ross vs Michele Ironsmith / Katie Healy6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2025-03-01vs Hills/Roset/55&Over9.0WWon 21
W#1 DoublesKaren Olson / Denise Agnew vs Tracey Williams / Heather O'Neill7-6, 7-5
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Burdick / Gail Gibson vs Dianne Albina / Margaret Roset6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAmy Lyons / Lori Gonzalez vs Stephanie Wager / Michele Ironsmith6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2025-02-27vs Hills/Roset/55&Over9.0WWon 20
W#1 DoublesLori Gonzalez / Karen Olson vs Dianne Albina / Margaret Roset2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDenise Agnew / Stacey Williams vs Katie Healy / Janet Karpan6-1, 6-2
2025-02-22vs Hills/Roset/55&Over9.0WLost 02
L#1 DoublesLori Gonzalez / Karen Olson vs Margaret Roset / Dianne Albina5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesGail Gibson / Elizabeth Burdick vs Michele Ironsmith / Stephanie Wager2-6, 3-6
2025-02-08vs Hills/Roset/55&Over9.0WSplit 11
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Baldwin / Elizabeth Burdick vs Dianne Albina / Margaret Roset2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesLori Gonzalez / Karen Olson vs Heather O'Neill / Michele Ironsmith6-4, 6-4
2025-01-18vs Hills/Roset/55&Over9.0WLost 12
L#1 DoublesDenise Agnew / Amy Lyons vs Katie Healy / Maki Smith6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Baldwin / Melany Jablonski vs Stephanie Wager / Michele Ironsmith2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Burdick / Gail Gibson vs Heather O'Neill / Tracey Williams6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 9.0 Adult 55 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.16 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.50
Elizabeth Baldwin
published
4.44
Gail Gibson
published
4.37
Denise Agnew
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.37
Lisa Ross
published
4.34
Lori Gonzalez
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.94
Amy Lyons
published 4.5
3.87
Melany Jablonski
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.81
Tish Wissel
published
3.79
Elizabeth Burdick
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lori Gonzalez + Denise Agnew303 matchesnot enough data
Elizabeth Burdick + Tish Wissel303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Elizabeth Baldwin
2W–8L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.50
Gail Gibson
7W–7L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.44
4.5
Denise Agnew
97W–36L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
4.37
Lisa Ross
6W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
4.37
Lori Gonzalez
127W–78L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
4.34
4.5
Amy Lyons
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
68%32%<1%
3.94
4
Melany Jablonski
135W–52L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.87
Tish Wissel
9W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%9%
3.81
4
Elizabeth Burdick
222W–79L career · 8 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.79

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.