Teams

Burson

2026 Lubbock Adult League 55 & Over · 7.0 Senior Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-04-16vs AlvarezLost 12
W#1 DoublesJeasik Cho / Garry Burson vs Paxton Rautis / David Rowell6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesGary Jameson / Mike Welch vs Stanley Brewer / John Chad Carter0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKirk Spears / Jerry Montgomery vs Thad Reid / Stephen Dalton2-6, 2-6
2026-04-09vs AlvarezLost 03
L#1 DoublesMike Welch / Gary Jameson vs Sergio Ceja / Paxton Rautis4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKirk Spears / Jerry Montgomery vs Simon Williams / Stanley Brewer3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKeith Robertson / Garry Burson vs John Chad Carter / David Rowell1-6, 2-6
2026-04-02vs AlvarezWon 21
W#1 DoublesJeasik Cho / Keith Robertson vs Simon Williams / Stanley Brewer4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesGary Jameson / Mike Welch vs Kody Kothmann / Sergio Ceja6-1, 7-5
L#3 DoublesJerry Montgomery / Garry Burson vs Thad Reid / Stephen Dalton4-6, 4-6
2026-03-25vs AlvarezLost 12
L#1 DoublesKirk Spears / Garry Burson vs Stanley Brewer / Simon Williams0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesGary Jameson / Mike Welch vs Kody Kothmann / Paxton Rautis5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJeasik Cho / Jerry Montgomery vs Sergio Ceja / Thad Reid7-6, 6-3
2026-03-20vs AlvarezLost 12
L#1 DoublesMike Welch / Gary Jameson vs Stephen Dalton / Thad Reid6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesGarry Burson / Jerry Montgomery vs Paxton Rautis / John Chad Carter4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJeasik Cho / Keith Robertson vs David Rowell / Kody Kothmann4-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 7.0 Senior Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Alvarez4110510122
2Burson1451022162

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.10
Jeasik Cho
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.08
Garry Burson
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.07
Kirk Spears
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.79
Mike Welch
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Gary Jameson
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Jerry Montgomery
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Keith Robertson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gary Jameson + Mike Welch1442% gamesnot enough data
Garry Burson + Jerry Montgomery0534% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jeasik Cho
8W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.10
3.5
Garry Burson
3W–15L career · 5 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.08
Kirk Spears
4W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
3.07
Mike Welch
1W–15L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
2.79
Gary Jameson
3W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jerry Montgomery
3W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Keith Robertson
8W–5L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.