Teams

PC- Stokes

2025 Ann · Gadsden

19 players · average NTRP 2.50 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-05-08Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJoyce Anderson / Teresa Hardy vs Emily Barnes / Allie Dutton0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Gadsden have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.61 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.03
Kim Tipton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.70
Laura Murrell
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.70
Laura Murrell
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.62
Nora Stokes
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
2.62
Nora Stokes
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
2.48
Winny Pedraza de Chacon
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
2.42
Karen Estes
usually #2 Doubles 42%, also #3 Doubles 42% · published
2.32
Kathy Parnell
usually #3 Doubles 58%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Channing Carder
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Drue Taylor
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Jan Sweatman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kim Ellison
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Kim Ellison
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
LISA PHILLIPS
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Lisa Ivey
published
Magen Bearden
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
Paula Gragg
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Susan Bradt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Teresa Hardy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kim Tipton + Laura Murrell3356% games+4.6% vs expected
Lisa Ivey + Magen Bearden123 matchesnot enough data
Winny Pedraza de Chacon + Kathy Parnell303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kim Tipton
16W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.03
Laura Murrell
17W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.70
Laura Murrell
17W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.70
Nora Stokes
14W–26L career · 7 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
2.62
Nora Stokes
14W–26L career · 7 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
2.62
Winny Pedraza de Chacon
8W–9L career · 7 lines in 2025
55%45%<1%
2.48
Karen Estes
10W–15L career · 12 lines in 2025
71%29%<1%
2.42
Kathy Parnell
12W–7L career · 12 lines in 2025
0%90%10%
2.32
2.5
Channing Carder
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Drue Taylor
7W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jan Sweatman
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kim Ellison
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kim Ellison
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
LISA PHILLIPS
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lisa Ivey
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Magen Bearden
10W–8L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
Paula Gragg
5W–1L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Susan Bradt
3W–1L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Teresa Hardy
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.