Teams

Ha-CC

2026 CORTA Southern Combo 40 & Over - Summer · Women 6.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.25 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-08-16vs Lynch/Walters-GILost 12
L#1 DoublesDonna Akin / Lynne Williamson vs Sarah Fletcher / Michele Snipes6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKaren Collins / Crystal Wilson vs Laura Dudley / Lynn Averett1-3
W#3 DoublesJeanene Wolf / Janet Jenkins vs Leah Poole / Sherry Bunn6-2, 6-4
2026-08-13vs Williams-Allen-CCLost 12
L#1 DoublesDarlene Graham / Crystal Wilson vs Naomi Rigby / Amy Forsyth6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLaura Auer / Karen Collins vs Patricia Dexter / Pearlie Jenkins1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesYun Ha / Renee Wilkinson vs Andrea Walden / Canita Johnson6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2026-08-02vs Milton-CCWon 21
W#1 DoublesLynne Williamson / Renee Wilkinson vs Sandy Galliher / Kimberly Gill6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLaura Auer / Maureen Bolinger vs Jamie Smith / Andrea Bingham6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesJeanene Wolf / Darlene Graham vs Jeaneen Thompson / Claire Fairchild6-4, 0-6, 0-1
2026-07-24vs Williams-Allen-CCWon 30
W#1 DoublesCrystal Wilson / Donna Akin vs Canita Johnson / Nancy Roman4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJeanene Wolf / Maureen Bolinger vs Pearlie Jenkins / Patricia Dexter7-6, 6-0
W#3 DoublesYun Ha / Karen Collins vs Sylvia Mckee / Cheryl DeYoung6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2026-07-21vs Milton-CCWon 30
W#1 DoublesLynne Williamson / Maureen Bolinger vs Jamie Smith / Helen Powell6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesYun Ha / Janet Jenkins vs Kerri Medders / Andrea Bingham6-1, 7-6
W#3 DoublesJeanene Wolf / Karen Collins vs Amy Nelson / Sarah Kimmel6-3, 6-2
2026-07-19vs Johnson-CCLost 03
L#1 DoublesCrystal Wilson / Renee Wilkinson vs India Hudson / Lindsay Mclaurin2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLaura Auer / Donna Akin vs Victoria Green / Dayna Johnson6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLynne Williamson / Karen Collins vs Michelle Beach / Susan Hrach1-6, 5-7
2026-07-12vs Lynch/Walters-GILost 12
L#1 DoublesJeanene Wolf / Donna Akin vs Sarah Fletcher / Michele Snipes2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesPino Davis / Darlene Graham vs Lynn Averett / Laura Dudley3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesCrystal Wilson / Renee Wilkinson vs Sherry Bunn / Hae Jin Kim6-3, 6-3
2026-07-07vs Hale-CCWon 21
L#1 DoublesLynne Williamson / Janet Jenkins vs Jennifer Chancey / Diana Newman4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLaura Auer / Renee Wilkinson vs Giovanna Guerra-Troche / Tara Tyler6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesYun Ha / Maureen Bolinger vs Natalie Morris / Joylene Coker6-2, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · Women 6.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Johnson-CC7019210156
2Lynch/Walters-GI5212921194
3Ha-CC44131125202
4Williams-Allen-CC3581634255

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.99 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.28
Pino Davis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Laura Auer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
Lynne Williamson
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.10
Maureen Bolinger
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.04
Yun Ha
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.03
Jeanene Wolf
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.01
Crystal Wilson
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.71
Darlene Graham
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.66
Donna Akin
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.57
Renee Wilkinson
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeanene Wolf + Yun Ha7362% games+21.7% vs expected
Renee Wilkinson + Maureen Bolinger5169% games+18.8% vs expected
Crystal Wilson + Laura Auer5161% games+6.9% vs expected
Lynne Williamson + Yun Ha22359% games+6.2% vs expected
Lynne Williamson + Laura Auer13264% games+5.4% vs expected
Jeanene Wolf + Laura Auer4161% games+5.2% vs expected
Yun Ha + Crystal Wilson8168% games+4.7% vs expected
Jeanene Wolf + Crystal Wilson3256% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Pino Davis
11W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
Laura Auer
29W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%92%5%
3.27
Lynne Williamson
60W–27L career · 5 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.20
Maureen Bolinger
16W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%24%76%
3.10
Yun Ha
68W–25L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%37%63%
3.04
Jeanene Wolf
40W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%41%59%
3.03
3.5
Crystal Wilson
65W–59L career · 5 lines in 2026
47%53%<1%
3.01
3
Darlene Graham
29W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
2.71
Donna Akin
10W–26L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%13%87%
2.66
Renee Wilkinson
21W–39L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%31%69%
2.57

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.