Teams

RCC Koch

2024 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Weekend Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-06-08vs ACAC StephensLost 01
L#1 SinglesAmy Boschen vs Dina Weddle1-6, 2-6
2024-06-01vs MTC Lady Miracles - CrewsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCrystal May / Lynda Weston vs Noelle Crews / Melanie Grossman6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDianne Sloane / Amy Boschen vs Jennifer Shaffer / Andrea McCauley7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2024-05-04Lost 01
L#2 DoublesAmy Boschen / Dianne Sloane vs Leigh Detreville-Long / Holly Martin0-6, 3-6
2024-04-27vs MAC GreenspoonLost 01
L#1 DoublesCrystal May / Pam Koch vs Therese Jones / Eunice Williams4-6, 6-7
2024-04-20vs Avalon - KallmanSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDarlene Moehling / Heather Drew vs Renita Randolph / Mary Tankersley6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesDianne Sloane / Amy Boschen vs Diana Dull / Joni Albrecht6-7, 3-6
2024-04-13vs RMC-SweeneyWon 10
W#1 DoublesCrystal May / Darlene Moehling vs Cynthia Muncy / Mona Stahling6-2, 6-3
2024-04-06vs Sal's Berries TornabeneLost 01
L#3 DoublesKathy van Natta / Amy Boschen vs Virginia Totaro / Stacey Piotrowski6-2, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Weekend Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Darlene Moehling
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.73
Crystal May
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.38
Heather Drew
published 3.5
3.25
Shannon Foster
published
Cris Latief
published 3.5
3.13
Berkeley Darr
published 3.5
2.90
Katheryn Enters
published
2.87
Amy Boschen
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.86
Pam Koch
published
2.64
Amy Wozniak
published 3
Katy Bassler
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Darlene Moehling
113W–77L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
3.88
4
Crystal May
243W–91L career · 7 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.73
3.5
Heather Drew
13W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
3.38
Shannon Foster
15W–11L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Cris Latief
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Berkeley Darr
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
15%84%<1%
3.13
Katheryn Enters
2W–8L career · no lines in 2024
77%23%<1%
2.90
3
Amy Boschen
154W–164L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
2.87
Pam Koch
2W–7L career · no lines in 2024
86%14%<1%
2.86
3
Amy Wozniak
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
14%86%<1%
2.64
Katy Bassler
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.