Teams

3 Belmont Berens

2022 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 18 & Over 4.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 4.60 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
W#1 SinglesAllyson Brand vs Shelley Morris6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKristen Crosthwaite / Laura Lafors vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-06-06vs 5 Willow Oaks BlackwoodWon 10
W#1 DoublesLaura Lafors / Lindsey Howard vs Joyce Steed / Robin Nester4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-06-05vs 1 Southampton LaneSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLaura Lafors / Susan Hanson vs Nina Moore / Tatiane Restani6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJackie Berens / Lindsey Wyeth vs Widna Benitez / Karna Hyman6-2, 7-6
2022-06-04Won 10
W#2 DoublesLindsey Wyeth / Allyson Brand vs Kemis Noble / Sarah Whitmore6-0, 6-0
2022-06-02vs 4 Belmont WilliamsWon 10
W#1 DoublesLaura Lafors / Allyson Brand vs Alicia Cecil / Courtney Greiner6-1, 6-3
2022-04-30vs 5 Willow Oaks BlackwoodWon 20
W#1 DoublesLaura Lafors / Susan Hanson vs April Kim / Lauren McCormick6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLindsey Howard / Allyson Brand vs Kirkland Hagerty / Jennifer Smith6-1, 6-0
2022-04-27vs 1 Southampton LaneWon 20
W#1 DoublesMary Napier / Laura Lafors vs Nina Moore / Tatiane Restani6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJackie Berens / Clara Laing vs Laura Earley / Ashley Hart6-1, 6-1
2022-04-24vs 4 Belmont WilliamsWon 20
W#1 DoublesMary Napier / Laura Lafors vs Hunter Harrell / Beth Robbins6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJackie Berens / Lindsey Howard vs Esther Fratkin / Stacy Lukanuski6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJackie Berens / Allyson Brand vs Irina Schaffernoth / Daniela Otto6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over 4.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.39 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.83
Clara Laing
published 5
4.79
Susan Hanson
published
4.64
Jenny Murray
published
4.39
Jackie Berens
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.29
Laura Lafors
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 4.5
Allyson Brand
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
Anna Shea
published 4.5
3.39
Lindsey Howard
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Lafors + Allyson Brand224 matchesnot enough data
Clara Laing + Lindsey Howard303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Clara Laing
6W–4L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
4.83
Susan Hanson
4W–1L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%5%
4.79
Jenny Murray
6W–8L career · no lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
4.64
4.5
Jackie Berens
89W–50L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
4.39
4.5
Laura Lafors
158W–80L career · 7 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
4.29
4.5
Allyson Brand
25W–22L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Anna Shea
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lindsey Howard
6W–1L career · no lines in 2022
100%0%0%
3.39

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.