Teams

Mixed Opportunities

2026 Mixed 55 and Over League · 8.0

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / MAUI

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2026-08-30vs Mike's 8.0Won 30
W#1 DoublesBrad Helman / Liezl Lao vs Ricky Tobita / Maylynn Ikioka6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCharlie Crandall / Mona Decrinis vs Kelly Tobita / Trudi Vierra1-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLee Wolfe / Deanna DiBiase vs Bruce Coelho / Pamela Singlehurst-kapisi6-2, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 8.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Mixed Opportunities000000
2Mike's 8.0000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.84 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.14
Charlie Crandall
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.96
Brad Helman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.92
Karen Sullivan
published
3.90
Deanna DiBiase
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.89
Jill Kanahele
published 4
3.88
Nobuo Kitayama
published 4
3.84
Kevin Hillman
published
3.79
Lee Wolfe
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Ben Massenburg
published 4
3.73
Mona Decrinis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.64
Liezl Lao
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.59
Juliana Massenburg
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jill Kanahele + Brad Helman5071% games+9.0% vs expected
Deanna DiBiase + Brad Helman10362% games+6.5% vs expected
Deanna DiBiase + Charlie Crandall3354% gamesnot enough data
Mona Decrinis + Charlie Crandall134 matchesnot enough data
Liezl Lao + Kevin Hillman303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Charlie Crandall
52W–47L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%14%86%
4.14
4
Brad Helman
66W–35L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%61%39%
3.96
Karen Sullivan
37W–33L career · no lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.92
4
Deanna DiBiase
144W–107L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.90
4
Jill Kanahele
252W–166L career · no lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.89
4
Nobuo Kitayama
12W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.88
Kevin Hillman
23W–19L career · no lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
3.84
4
Lee Wolfe
83W–35L career · 1 line in 2026
1%93%5%
3.79
4
Ben Massenburg
20W–19L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
4
Mona Decrinis
103W–125L career · 1 line in 2026
4%94%2%
3.73
Liezl Lao
42W–129L career · 1 line in 2026
14%86%<1%
3.64
Juliana Massenburg
37W–35L career · no lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.59

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.