Teams

Shaddock/LR/LRAC

2024 Singles 18 & Over · 3.0 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.17 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-01-26vs Watts/NLR/BPWon 30
W#1 SinglesNatalie Gorman vs Emily Gates6-1, 6-4
W#2 SinglesChristine Althoff vs Haylee Scott6-2, 6-3
W#3 SinglesAislinn Andrews vs Holly Taylor6-1, 6-2
2025-01-19vs Jennings-PVCCLost 12
W#1 SinglesMaeve Shaddock vs Jo Margaret Bennett6-4, 6-3
L#2 SinglesAislinn Andrews vs Laura Hum6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 SinglesAshley Burch vs Sarah Mathews3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2024-12-19vs Watts/NLR/BPWon 21
W#1 SinglesMary Thalheimer vs Haylee Scott6-0, 6-1
W#2 SinglesNatalie Gorman vs Tracy Foster6-3, 6-1
L#3 SinglesMaeve Shaddock vs Brandi Watts2-6, 3-6
2024-12-12vs Rabinowitz/LR/CCLRLost 02
L#1 SinglesAislinn Andrews vs Hannah Rabinowitz4-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesAshley Burch vs Allison Anthony7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2024-11-14vs Rabinowitz/LR/CCLRLost 12
L#1 SinglesMary Thalheimer vs Bailey Pollock2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 SinglesNatalie Gorman vs Elizabeth Blackshaw6-4, 6-2
L#3 SinglesAislinn Andrews vs Allison Anthony1-6, 1-6
2024-11-06vs Hicks/LR/RebLost 12
L#1 SinglesNatalie Gorman vs Katie Hicks4-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesMaeve Shaddock vs Hayley Hackett6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesAislinn Andrews vs Leslie Warford6-7, 3-6
2024-10-29vs Jennings-PVCCWon 21
W#1 SinglesMary Thalheimer vs Keelen Verser6-1, 6-1
W#2 SinglesNatalie Gorman vs Sarah Mathews6-1, 6-1
L#3 SinglesAislinn Andrews vs Lindsey Wittenberg7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2024-10-21vs Scott/LR/BPWon 30
W#1 SinglesChristine Althoff vs Briana Crowder4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 SinglesNatalie Gorman vs Sarah Rech6-1, 6-1
W#3 SinglesMaeve Shaddock vs Courtney Klotz6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Mary Thalheimer
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.41
Ashley Burch
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
3.37
Natalie Gorman
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.31
Christine Althoff
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 3.5
Aislinn Andrews
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 3
Maeve Shaddock
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary Thalheimer
46W–21L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%52%48%
3.49
3
Ashley Burch
19W–3L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%<1%>99%
3.41
Natalie Gorman
34W–28L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Christine Althoff
49W–25L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.31
3
Aislinn Andrews
5W–8L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
Maeve Shaddock
9W–10L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.