Teams

Wilson 3.0W 18s Wed PM

2024 Piedmont USTA 18 & Over · WOMEN 3.0 18 & Over

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-04-17vs Lane/Bodine 3.0W 18s Wed PMLost 01
L#1 DoublesJennifer Emrey / Disha Narayanan vs Kelly Cope / Jessica Baker1-6, 2-6
2024-04-10vs Jones 3.0W 18s Wed PMWon 10
W#1 SinglesDisha Narayanan vs Corinne Kendall6-0, 6-1
2024-04-03vs O'Shaughnessy 3.0W 18s Wed PMWon 10
W#1 SinglesDisha Narayanan vs Hannah Miller6-0, 6-1
2024-03-28vs Grayzer/Johnson 3.0W 18s Wed PMWon 10
W#2 DoublesCozetta Gaines / Disha Narayanan vs Ashley Jamison / Tiffany Hardin7-5, 6-0
2024-03-20vs Davis 3.0W 18s Wed PMWon 10
W#2 SinglesDisha Narayanan vs Cheryl Rankin6-1, 6-1
2024-03-13Won 10
W#2 SinglesDisha Narayanan vs Caroline Walker6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.73 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.17
Alexa Smith
published 3
2.94
Catherine Martin
published 3
2.88
Suki Gutierrez
published
2.84
Allison Aldridge
published 3
2.81
Cozetta Gaines
published 3
Ashley Raper
published 3
2.67
Disha Narayanan
usually #1 Singles 38%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
2.50
Julia Saguier
published
2.40
Meredith Vaughn
published
2.31
Graceanne Schuster
published
Rebecca McNeill
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julia Saguier + Meredith Vaughn123 matchesnot enough data
Allison Aldridge + Alexa Smith123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Alexa Smith
30W–20L career · no lines in 2024
<1%11%89%
3.17
3
Catherine Martin
7W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%65%34%
2.94
Suki Gutierrez
32W–43L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
2.88
3
Allison Aldridge
5W–12L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%13%
2.84
3
Cozetta Gaines
17W–22L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Ashley Raper
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Disha Narayanan
30W–52L career · 8 lines in 2024
11%88%1%
2.67
Julia Saguier
32W–25L career · no lines in 2024
0%49%51%
2.50
Meredith Vaughn
7W–19L career · no lines in 2024
0%76%24%
2.40
Jenna Bialik-Speight
8W–14L career · no lines in 2024
91%9%<1%
2.31
Graceanne Schuster
5W–20L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Rebecca McNeill
6W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.