Teams

MAC-Aguilar

2020 Adult 18 & Over · 4.5 Men

4 players · average NTRP 4.38 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.94 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.02
Mike Easton
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4.5
3.96
Christopher Haddon
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.93
Rodrigo Aguilar
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.84
Alex Young
published 4
Results4 ties
2020-03-01Won 10
W#2 SinglesMike Easton vs Cord Speelman6-0, 1-1
2020-02-09Lost 02
L#2 DoublesRodrigo Aguilar / Craig Johanson vs Erik Rhodes / Matt Dwyer6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesChristopher Haddon / Joseph Remington vs James Crutchfield / Josh Greene6-4, 7-5
2020-01-19Lost 03
L#1 DoublesRodrigo Aguilar / Craig Johanson vs Jeremy Morris / David Tinsley6-4, 6-4
L#2 SinglesMike Easton vs Adrien Leemin6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesChristopher Haddon / David O'Brien vs John Ezelle / Todd Klindt6-0, 6-1
2020-01-06Split 11
L#2 DoublesChristopher Haddon / Nick Kassab vs James Crutchfield / Andrew Kerr6-4, 6-4
W#2 SinglesMike Easton vs Thomas Schaap6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Mike Easton
52W–45L career
16%84%0%
4.02
4.5
Christopher Haddon
39W–77L career
25%75%0%
3.96
4.5
Rodrigo Aguilar
37W–36L career
38%62%0%
3.93
4
Alex Young
42W–22L career
0%96%3%
3.84

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.