Teams

Kirkland 3.5 Mixed

2026 Tuscaloosa USTA Mixed Tournament 18 & Over -Winter · 3.5 Adult Mixed

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-01-17vs Duren 18+ Mixed Winter TournamentWon 21
W#1 DoublesJoshua Lee / Kristin Wallace vs Axl Buchheit / Jamie Pearson6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesTara Ketchum / Reid Ketchum vs Melissa Jacobs / Jonathan Wingo5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesWes Vaughn / Stephanie Panagiotides vs Scott Smith / Tanya Kisner2-6, 2-6
2026-01-17vs FinneyWon 30
W#1 DoublesStephanie Kirkland / Joshua Lee vs Jade Mason / Byron Eaton6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTara Ketchum / Reid Ketchum vs JR Penick / Melanie Ridgeway6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesChad Jaggers / Kristin Wallace vs Julie Beckham / Bradley Wilkins6-4, 6-4
2026-01-17vs TTC Simpson/DuttonSplit 11
W#2 DoublesStephanie Kirkland / Reid Ketchum vs Ciana Ortiguera / Craig Alverson6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesWes Vaughn / Stephanie Panagiotides vs Marie Zassoda / Xinyu Li4-6, 1-6
2026-01-16vs TTC Cash MixedWon 30
W#1 DoublesKristin Wallace / Joshua Lee vs Katherine Garayanala / Cristian Mendez5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesReid Ketchum / Erin Moore vs Porter Lawless / Elizabeth Eberhart6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesChad Jaggers / Stephanie Kirkland vs Olivia Outlaw / Clifton Lewis6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · 3.5 Adult Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
13.5 - Miller40102689
2Kirkland 3.5 Mixed40102799
3Sullivan 3.5 Mixed225715125
4TTC Simpson/Dutton135714103
5Duren 18+ Mixed Winter Tournament134817120
6TTC Cash Mixed134817120
7Finney134818117

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Kristin Wallace
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.02
Stephanie Panagiotides
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
Reid Ketchum
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.93
Stephanie Kirkland
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.89
Chad Jaggers
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.89
Wes Vaughn
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.57
Tara Ketchum
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Reid Ketchum + Tara Ketchum8354% games+14.2% vs expected
Wes Vaughn + Stephanie Panagiotides224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristin Wallace
36W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
3.45
Stephanie Panagiotides
53W–42L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%43%57%
3.02
Reid Ketchum
21W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
3.02
Stephanie Kirkland
48W–36L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
2.93
3
Chad Jaggers
23W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%77%22%
2.89
Wes Vaughn
32W–24L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
2.89
Tara Ketchum
21W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
2.57

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.