Teams

Haugh - Highland

2022 Sandhills Tri Level 18 & over · 3.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.38 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-26vs McClymont - CCNCLost 02
L#1 DoublesCatherine Christianson / Andrea Tatman vs Christy Clark / Kate King4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMary Haugh / Jennifer Joeckel vs Laura Thompson / Shannon Allison3-6, 1-6
2022-07-25vs Harris - Lawn & TennisWon 20
W#1 DoublesMargaret Barefoot / Andrea Tatman vs Leigh Velevis / Theresa Roach6-0, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMartha Lerario / Jennifer Joeckel vs Michele Santiago / Donna Hicks7-6, 6-4
2022-07-20Lost 02
L#1 DoublesClaire Collins / Andrea Tatman vs Joy Martin / Susan Omell6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSerriah Ciccone / Jennifer Joeckel vs Lynne McDonough / Yvonne Rouse6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2022-07-14vs Osterman - Lawn & TennisLost 01
L#3 DoublesMary Haugh / Jennifer Joeckel vs Jen Barton / Mary Howard4-6, 2-6
2022-07-12Lost 01
L#2 DoublesRosemary McLean / Jennifer Joeckel vs Tanya Zoppi / Kailey Parziale5-7, 5-7
2022-06-30vs Brooks - Pinehurst CCLost 01
L#3 DoublesEsther Thompson / Jennifer Joeckel vs Mary Rice / Kelley Hester4-6, 2-6
2022-05-26vs Brooks - Pinehurst CCWon 10
W#3 DoublesEsther Thompson / Jennifer Joeckel vs Mary Rice / Renee Ference6-4, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Margaret Barefoot
published
3.81
Rosemary McLean
published
3.79
Andrea Tatman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.71
3.70
Susan Edmonds
published
3.46
Caroline Parks
published 3.5
3.40
Jennifer Joeckel
usually #3 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.18
Dawn Dixon
published 3.5
3.15
Marion Bryan
published
2.96
Laurie Cherry
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.75
Serriah Ciccone
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.60
Martha Lerario
published
2.43
Mary Haugh
published
Esther Thompson
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marion Bryan + Susan Edmonds134 matchesnot enough data
Susan Edmonds + Catherine Christianson314 matchesnot enough data
Andrea Tatman + Dawn Dixon134 matchesnot enough data
Dawn Dixon + Catherine Christianson044 matchesnot enough data
Marion Bryan + Andrea Tatman303 matchesnot enough data
Marion Bryan + Catherine Christianson123 matchesnot enough data
Susan Edmonds + Andrea Tatman303 matchesnot enough data
Andrea Tatman + Rosemary McLean123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Margaret Barefoot
21W–19L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.82
Rosemary McLean
16W–8L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Andrea Tatman
77W–64L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.79
4
Catherine Christianson
21W–29L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.71
Susan Edmonds
34W–30L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
3.5
Caroline Parks
33W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%63%37%
3.46
3.5
Jennifer Joeckel
51W–28L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%78%21%
3.40
3.5
Dawn Dixon
33W–30L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
Marion Bryan
18W–27L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.15
3
Laurie Cherry
93W–106L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%62%38%
2.96
3
Serriah Ciccone
49W–54L career · 4 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
Martha Lerario
10W–29L career · no lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
2.60
Mary Haugh
5W–16L career · no lines in 2022
72%28%<1%
2.43
2.5
Esther Thompson
6W–13L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.