Teams

Liberty Park Tennis-Arena

2023 USTA Mixed 18 & Over · mixed 10.0 18 & over

8 players · average NTRP 4.75 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2023-06-04Won 10
W#1 DoublesSierra Krebsbach / Christopher Arena vs Lisa Sterbenz / Alex Kester6-2, 6-3
2023-06-04Won 10
W#1 DoublesSierra Krebsbach / Christopher Arena vs Lisa Sterbenz / Gabriel Pilones6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · mixed 10.0 18 & over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Liberty Park Tennis-Arena31102447
2Liberty Park Tennis-Sterbenz1321020132

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.45 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

5.00
Amanda Pratzel
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 5
Christopher Arena
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.64
Sierra Krebsbach
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 5
4.41
Jason Hardin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.39
Ashley Miyazaki
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 4.5
4.36
Katherine Rist
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.22
Cole Paterson
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.13
Arthur Miyazaki
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ashley Miyazaki + Arthur Miyazaki37561% games+18.0% vs expected
Christopher Arena + Sierra Krebsbach10171% games+3.1% vs expected
Amanda Pratzel + Cole Paterson8168% gamesnot enough data
Amanda Pratzel + Arthur Miyazaki7069% gamesnot enough data
Jason Hardin + Sierra Krebsbach7072% gamesnot enough data
Cole Paterson + Katherine Rist134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Amanda Pratzel
62W–6L career · 4 lines in 2023
no projection at this level
5.00
5
Christopher Arena
27W–10L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
5
Sierra Krebsbach
107W–37L career · 6 lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.64
Jason Hardin
82W–25L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%73%27%
4.41
4.5
Ashley Miyazaki
106W–38L career · 14 lines in 2023
<1%77%22%
4.39
Katherine Rist
20W–13L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%84%16%
4.36
4.5
Cole Paterson
46W–37L career · 4 lines in 2023
5%92%2%
4.22
4.5
Arthur Miyazaki
126W–34L career · 9 lines in 2023
18%81%<1%
4.13

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.