Teams

Escambia/Ehlers

2026 Escambia Adult 18 & Over · 4.5 Adult 18 & Over - Men

11 players · average NTRP 4.50 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-08vs Richardson - RS ClayWon 40
W#1 DoublesStephen Baes / Thomas Gore vs Michael Richardson Jr / Anthony Bonjorno6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesBrian Jordan vs Mario Stramaglia6-1, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKyle Ehlers / Kody Ehlers vs Will Spencer / Robert Fabbro4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLubomir Kaderjak / Rafael Gerdes Macedo vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-06-17vs Richardson - RS ClayWon 40
W#1 DoublesAlejandro Avila / Thomas Gore vs Cosme Barrios / Robert Fabbro6-2, 6-0
W#1 SinglesKyle Ehlers vs Michael Richardson Jr6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKody Ehlers / Brian Jordan vs Anthony Bonjorno / Josh Sitton6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJames Smith / Lubomir Kaderjak vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-06-10vs Richardson - RS ClayWon 40
W#1 DoublesAlejandro Avila / Thomas Gore vs Anthony Bonjorno / Paul Einhart6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesHayden Essary vs Mario Stramaglia4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBrian Jordan / Edan Benitez vs Cosme Barrios / Collin Perciballi7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJames Smith / Thales De Souza Machado vs Will Spencer / Robert Fabbro6-2, 6-3
2026-06-03vs Richardson - RS ClayWon 30
W#1 DoublesKyle Ehlers / Edan Benitez vs Michael Richardson Jr / Cosme Barrios6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesHayden Essary vs Jackson McCullar6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesStephen Baes / Brian Jordan vs Anthony Bonjorno / Josh Sitton4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2026-05-27vs Richardson - RS ClayWon 31
W#1 DoublesJames Smith / Alejandro Avila vs Michael Richardson Jr / Paul Einhart6-2, 6-2
L#1 SinglesKyle Ehlers vs Mario Stramaglia2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesStephen Baes / Rafael Gerdes Macedo vs Robert Fabbro / Collin Perciballi6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKody Ehlers / Lubomir Kaderjak vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-05-20vs Richardson - RS ClayWon 30
W#1 DoublesLubomir Kaderjak / Hayden Essary vs Josh Sitton / Will Spencer7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKyle Ehlers / Stephen Baes vs Anthony Bonjorno / Robert Fabbro6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAlejandro Avila / Thales De Souza Machado vs Michael Richardson Jr / Cosme Barrios7-5, 6-3
2026-05-13vs Richardson - RS ClayWon 40
W#1 DoublesJames Smith / Brian Jordan vs Paul Einhart / Jackson McCullar3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesEdan Benitez vs Mario Stramaglia6-0, 7-6
W#2 DoublesKyle Ehlers / Hayden Essary vs Jerry Mosley / Cosme Barrios6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesStephen Baes / Thomas Gore vs Josh Sitton / Will Spencer6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2026-05-06vs Richardson - RS ClayWon 31
W#1 DoublesStephen Baes / Rafael Gerdes Macedo vs Michael Richardson Jr / Collin Perciballi6-3, 6-0
L#1 SinglesThales De Souza Machado vs Mario Stramaglia1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJames Smith / Alejandro Avila vs Anthony Bonjorno / Robert Fabbro6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKyle Ehlers / Brian Jordan vs Josh Sitton / Will Spencer7-6, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Adult 18 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.31 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.59
Alejandro Avila
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.48
Stephen Baes
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.40
Hayden Essary
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
4.36
Kody Ehlers
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.35
Lubomir Kaderjak
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.31
Brian Jordan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4.5
4.27
Edan Benitez
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.22
Thomas Gore
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
4.11
Kyle Ehlers
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 29% · published
4.01
Thales De Souza Machado
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Rafael Gerdes Macedo
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brian Jordan + Kyle Ehlers12267% games+3.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Alejandro Avila
5W–0L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%25%75%
4.59
Stephen Baes
16W–3L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%56%44%
4.48
Hayden Essary
4W–0L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
4.40
Kody Ehlers
22W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%84%16%
4.36
4.5
Lubomir Kaderjak
183W–34L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
4.35
4.5
Brian Jordan
99W–25L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
4.31
Edan Benitez
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
4.27
Thomas Gore
4W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
4.22
Kyle Ehlers
40W–18L career · 7 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
4.11
Thales De Souza Machado
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
47%53%<1%
4.01
Rafael Gerdes Macedo
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.