Teams

DTW Nolan

2025 Adult 55 & Over-GC · Men 3.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-04-22vs Newman-TOCCLost 12
L#1 DoublesMichael Wellman / Freddie Wilkerson vs William Moore / Fred Moran6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJan Lohmeyer / Brian Welch vs John Cleary / Pete Mitchell6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesEric Nolan / William Warren vs Brian Brouckaert / Robbie Johnson5-7, 6-7
2025-03-31vs BBTC StrussLost 12
L#1 DoublesDaniel Rickard / Jan Lohmeyer vs Kurt Allen / Marty Warren3-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesMichael Wellman / Freddie Wilkerson vs Richard Struss / Martin Crump6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesBrian Welch / Edmond Meyer vs Johnny Frazier / Scott Pridgen4-6, 2-6
2025-03-25vs Newman-TOCCWon 30
W#1 DoublesWilliam Warren / Brian Welch vs David Spencer / Fred Moran6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesMichael Wellman / Freddie Wilkerson vs James Whitney / Charlie Neumann6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJan Lohmeyer / Daniel Rickard vs Chuck Burkhard / Pete Mitchell6-1, 6-0
2025-03-18vs Newman-TOCCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesPeter Weil / Brian Welch vs Charlie Neumann / John Cleary6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesEric Nolan / William Warren vs Chris Ashbaker / Jim Sukiennik6-4, 6-2
2025-03-06vs BBTC StrussWon 21
W#1 DoublesEdmond Meyer / Brian Welch vs Mike Cooper / Kevin Gallagher6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMichael Wellman / Peter Weil vs Barney Creel / Scott Pridgen6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesDaniel Rickard / Jan Lohmeyer vs Johnny Frazier / Michael Cooper7-6, 5-7, 0-1
2025-02-25vs BBTC StrussWon 30
W#1 DoublesJan Lohmeyer / Peter Weil vs Richard Struss / Mike Cooper6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMichael Wellman / Freddie Wilkerson vs Michael Cooper / Barney Creel6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDaniel Rickard / Edmond Meyer vs Martin Crump / Kevin Gallagher6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2025-02-18vs BBTC StrussWon 30
W#1 DoublesMichael Wellman / Freddie Wilkerson vs Richard Struss / Marty Warren6-7, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 DoublesWilliam Warren / ED LOZES vs Johnny Frazier / Martin Crump6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesBrian Welch / Edmond Meyer vs David Boggs / Mike Cooper7-6, 6-2
2025-02-11vs Newman-TOCCWon 30
W#1 DoublesFreddie Wilkerson / Michael Wellman vs Bubba Newman / David Spencer6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJan Lohmeyer / Peter Weil vs John Cleary / James Whitney6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesBrian Welch / William Warren vs Jim Sukiennik / Brian Brouckaert6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Men 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1DTW Nolan5317718179
2BBTC Struss44111328225
3Newman-TOCC3581635246

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.04
Freddie Wilkerson
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.99
Michael Wellman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published
2.96
Peter Weil
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.86
William Warren
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.83
Jan Lohmeyer
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Brian Welch
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Daniel Rickard
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Edmond Meyer
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.73
ED LOZES
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.45
Eric Nolan
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Wellman + Freddie Wilkerson7556% games+0.5% vs expected
Brian Welch + Edmond Meyer4350% gamesnot enough data
Daniel Rickard + Peter Weil2349% gamesnot enough data
Daniel Rickard + Jan Lohmeyer224 matchesnot enough data
Eric Nolan + William Warren224 matchesnot enough data
Michael Wellman + Peter Weil123 matchesnot enough data
Brian Welch + Eric Nolan123 matchesnot enough data
Freddie Wilkerson + Jan Lohmeyer123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Freddie Wilkerson
40W–26L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%38%62%
3.04
Michael Wellman
29W–31L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
2.99
Peter Weil
17W–20L career · 4 lines in 2025
61%39%<1%
2.96
William Warren
15W–13L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%86%13%
2.86
Jan Lohmeyer
18W–9L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.83
3
Brian Welch
13W–12L career · 9 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Daniel Rickard
8W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Edmond Meyer
5W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
ED LOZES
9W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Eric Nolan
4W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
64%36%<1%
2.45

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.