Teams

Burks-Buchanan/Knoxville

2026 Adult 18 & Over-Knoxville · 2.5 Women

6 players · average NTRP 2.50 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-05-12vs Niles-Holt/KnoxvilleWon 20
W#1 DoublesSarah Buchanan / Rachel Burks vs Leigh Gatto / Cindy Holt6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAshley Jones / Kimberly LeRoy vs Heather Carroll / Melissa Kirby6-3, 6-4
2026-05-04vs WegnerReid/KnoxvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesMindy Blakeslee / Meredith Godbold vs Ann Wegner / Rebecca Cantrell1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesKimberly LeRoy vs Catherine White2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesRachel Burks / Sarah Buchanan vs Molly Teague / Jenny Burghardt3-6, 2-6
2026-04-14Split 11
L#1 DoublesMaddy Wycoff / Amy McCleary vs Natalie Cudzilo / Carrie Wegryn6-4, 0-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRachel Burks / Anne Skinner vs Sissy Green / Ashley Buckley6-0, 6-0
2026-04-07vs DoironTapp/KnoxvilleSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSarah Buchanan / Meredith Godbold vs Kellye Tapp / Jeanne Bernier3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAmy McCleary / Maddy Wycoff vs Janeen Staack / Brittany Smith6-3, 6-1
2026-03-31Won 10
W#1 DoublesKimberly LeRoy / Anne Skinner vs Jennifer Bruce / Miranda Kiser6-2, 6-3
2026-03-24vs Niles-Holt/KnoxvilleWon 20
W#1 DoublesKimberly LeRoy / Amy McCleary vs Kim Lushbaugh / Sherry van Beke6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesRachel Burks / Meredith Godbold vs Claire Dickenson / Eliza Dickenson6-1, 6-1
2026-03-17vs Blackburn/KnoxvilleWon 21
W#1 DoublesAdriana Shimeall / Amy McCleary vs Lexi Blackburn / Brittany Dilworth6-0, 6-4
L#1 SinglesKimberly LeRoy vs Megan Parker4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesRachel Burks / Anne Skinner vs Suzanne Christensen / Sarah Connor6-0, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.34 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.55
Amy McCleary
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 2.5
2.52
Anne Skinner
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.37
Kimberly LeRoy
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.33
Rachel Burks
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
2.30
Adriana Shimeall
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
1.97
Meredith Godbold
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Adriana Shimeall + Amy McCleary224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Amy McCleary
14W–12L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%36%64%
2.55
2.5
Anne Skinner
3W–0L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
0%43%57%
2.52
Kimberly LeRoy
11W–20L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%82%18%
2.37
Rachel Burks
7W–12L career · 8 lines in 2026
0%88%12%
2.33
2.5
Adriana Shimeall
5W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
0%93%7%
2.30
Meredith Godbold
5W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.97

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.