Teams

GS - Ivey

2025 Combo 40 & Over Day League - GS · 6.5 Adult Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.17 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-08-18vs GS - SterlingLost 02
L#1 DoublesSarah Harris / Gina Ivey vs Trish Kington / LAURY KOONTZ1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesCatherine Cubbage / Renita Myers vs Leanne Collins / Terri Ammons4-6, 1-6
2025-08-11vs GS - SterlingLost 02
L#1 DoublesAmanda Hancock / Lori Nicholson vs Ellen Lee / LAURY KOONTZ0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSarah Harris / Renita Myers vs Susan Carroll / Marcy Costa3-6, 1-6
2025-08-04vs GS - SterlingLost 02
L#1 DoublesJudy Shimoda-Stiff / Irina Matushchenko vs Connie Chenoweth Butts / April Schweigert1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesAmanda Hancock / Renita Myers vs Marcy Costa / Ashley Wheeler1-6, 0-6
2025-07-28vs GS - SterlingLost 03
L#1 DoublesSarah Harris / Judy Shimoda-Stiff vs Misty Payne / Terri Ammons0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAmanda Hancock / Debra Walters vs Jill Kunkel / April Schweigert0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCatherine Cubbage / Gina Ivey vs Ashley Wheeler / Marcy Costa6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2025-07-21vs GS - SterlingLost 03
L#1 DoublesAmanda Hancock / Irina Matushchenko vs Misty Payne / Terri Ammons2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesCatherine Cubbage / Amanda Williamson vs Heather Sefton-Sterling / April Schweigert4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesGina Ivey / Debra Walters vs Leanne Collins / Julie Sowell0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Adult Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.14
Amanda Hancock
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.84
Shelli Semiklose
published
Catherine Cubbage
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.66
Amanda Williamson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.60
Irina Matushchenko
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.57
Renita Myers
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Gina Ivey
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Judy Shimoda-Stiff
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Lori Nicholson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amanda Williamson + Irina Matushchenko2351% games+15.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Amanda Hancock
3W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.14
Shelli Semiklose
7W–13L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%13%
2.84
3
Catherine Cubbage
0W–3L career · type S · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Amanda Williamson
7W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
13%86%1%
2.66
Irina Matushchenko
14W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%25%75%
2.60
Renita Myers
3W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%31%69%
2.57
Gina Ivey
2W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Judy Shimoda-Stiff
2W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lori Nicholson
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.