Teams

BC-MCC/AmySchmargen

2024 Adult 40 & Over - Beach Cities · BC Women - 3.5

17 players · average NTRP 3.42 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for BC Women - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Pamela Lopez
published
3.47
Anne Gumm
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
Ivy Charlton
published
3.28
Kari Carpino
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
Leslie Lancry
published
3.27
Caroline Payne
published 3.5
3.26
Sandy Quigley
published
3.25
Janet Zuccarini
published
3.24
Amanda West
published 3.5
3.21
Amanda Gregory
published 3.5
3.18
Audra Steller
published 3.5
3.17
Lora Penczar
published
3.11
Rachel Alexander
published
3.03
Amy Schmargen
published 3
2.99
Tiffany Chen
published
2.93
Donna Hughes
published
Martha Kretzmer
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amanda West + Janet Zuccarini044 matchesnot enough data
Amanda West + Caroline Payne213 matchesnot enough data
Amanda West + Audra Steller123 matchesnot enough data
Amanda Gregory + Caroline Payne123 matchesnot enough data
Janet Zuccarini + Lora Penczar213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Pamela Lopez
21W–8L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.80
3.5
Anne Gumm
67W–51L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
3.47
Ivy Charlton
9W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%1%99%
3.32
Kari Carpino
41W–99L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
Leslie Lancry
7W–3L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Caroline Payne
12W–8L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
Sandy Quigley
4W–7L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.26
Janet Zuccarini
4W–10L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Amanda West
13W–25L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Amanda Gregory
11W–11L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.21
3.5
Audra Steller
3W–12L career · no lines in 2024
9%89%1%
3.18
Lora Penczar
6W–7L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.17
Rachel Alexander
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.11
3
Amy Schmargen
6W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%42%58%
3.03
Tiffany Chen
6W–9L career · no lines in 2024
52%48%<1%
2.99
Donna Hughes
3W–8L career · no lines in 2024
69%31%<1%
2.93
Martha Kretzmer
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.