Teams

FCC:Ferncroft CC:Cirolo

2022 EMA Adult 40 & Over Women · 3.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 2.93 / EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-07-25vs WTC:Winchester:FitzgeraldLost 03
L#1 DoublesAndrea Sorgi Spano / Danielle J Casazza vs Jill Sullivan / Heather Weston3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesChristine McKenna / DENISE NEWELL vs Emily Fitzgerald / Alyssa Kelley2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesVicki Whichard / Christine Bailey vs Deanna Castro / Lisa Barrett4-6, 5-6
2022-07-11vs MAC:Manchester:VaroudakisSplit 22
W#1 DoublesKim McNulty / Kathryn Connell vs Lisa Hollis / Susan Burr6-1, 6-4
L#1 SinglesCarolyn Gardner vs Laura Jones0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesDanielle J Casazza / Vicki Whichard vs Megan Davis / Lori Toner6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesChristine McKenna / Amy Walsh vs Maura Blundin / Jen Zeilman1-6, 0-6
2022-06-27vs BRTC:Bass River:LuttonLost 12
W#1 DoublesKathryn Connell / Kim McNulty vs Millie Lourenco / Khristie Wilkins6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAmy Turcotte / Elizabeth Reti vs Amy DeSimone / Lori Lutton3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesEileen Dwortz / Anamarija Kristic vs Michele Campbell / Emily Werner1-6, 2-6
2022-06-20vs WSTC:Winchester S&T:Nguyen/DunnLost 13
L#1 DoublesDanielle J Casazza / Ragnhild Roycroft vs Liz Dunn / Elizabeth Wang6-7, 5-7
L#1 SinglesCarolyn Gardner vs Leyla Kimball0-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAmy Walsh / Christine McKenna vs Caren Connelly / Robin Ketterer2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesVicki Whichard / Eileen Dwortz vs Christianne Baruqui / Nancy Dou6-0, 6-0
2022-06-13vs NEW:Newburyport Green:Zizza/NealeLost 03
L#1 SinglesCarolyn Gardner vs Carrie Zizza2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesDanielle J Casazza / Eileen Dwortz vs Marianne Thurlow / Megan Arel4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesVicki Whichard / Christine McKenna vs Susan Toleos / Sally Palen3-6, 5-7
2022-06-06vs MAC:Manchester:VaroudakisLost 04
L#1 DoublesNancy Cannon / Kim McNulty vs Maria Fabbo / Laura Jones6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#1 SinglesEileen Dwortz vs Tracy McLaughlin1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDanielle J Casazza / Andrea Sorgi Spano vs Marit von Tetzchner / Jen Zeilman6-3, 0-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesChristine McKenna / Ragnhild Roycroft vs Susan Burr / Nicole Roikola1-6, 1-6
2022-05-16vs WSTC:Winchester S&T:Nguyen/DunnLost 03
L#1 DoublesTricia McSweeney / Danielle J Casazza vs Liz Dunn / Elizabeth Wang0-4
L#2 DoublesEileen Dwortz / Vicki Whichard vs Sylvie Barlos / Nancy Dou0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Reti / Christine McKenna vs Caren Connelly / Jennifer Adams1-6, 2-6
2022-05-09vs NEW:Newburyport Green:Zizza/NealeLost 12
L#1 DoublesRagnhild Roycroft / Tricia McSweeney vs Nora Neale / Carrie Zizza5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesDanielle J Casazza / Kim McNulty vs Marianne Thurlow / Jillian Hoyle4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKaty Miller / Elizabeth Reti vs Katherine Weinstock / Susan Toleos3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.52 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Amy Walsh
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.83
Danielle J Casazza
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3
Christine Bailey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.57
Elizabeth Reti
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.55
Kim McNulty
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.55
Ragnhild Roycroft
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.49
Tricia McSweeney
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.39
DENISE NEWELL
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.25
Carolyn Gardner
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 2.5
Eileen Dwortz
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
Michelle Schank
published
Vicki Whichard
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carolyn Gardner + DENISE NEWELL0828% games−12.2% vs expected
Ragnhild Roycroft + Tricia McSweeney1440% gamesnot enough data
Kim McNulty + Tricia McSweeney224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Amy Walsh
0W–7L career · type S · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Danielle J Casazza
14W–14L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%89%10%
2.83
3
Christine Bailey
10W–15L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
3
Elizabeth Reti
9W–19L career · 3 lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
2.57
Kim McNulty
29W–26L career · 4 lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
2.55
Ragnhild Roycroft
1W–12L career · 3 lines in 2022
35%65%<1%
2.55
Tricia McSweeney
5W–17L career · 2 lines in 2022
52%48%<1%
2.49
3
DENISE NEWELL
2W–26L career · 1 line in 2022
81%19%<1%
2.39
2.5
Carolyn Gardner
2W–31L career · 3 lines in 2022
0%97%3%
2.25
2.5
Eileen Dwortz
4W–11L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Michelle Schank
3W–11L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Vicki Whichard
3W–6L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.