Teams

JTC - Porter

2023 Alachua Mixed 40 & Over · 8.0 Mixed 40 & Over

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-04-04vs ALACHUA/Blair/40&Over8.0XDLost 01
L#2 DoublesStephanie Ryan / Roy Cribb vs Christa Arnold / David Blumberg7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2023-03-26vs JTC - FullerWon 20
W#2 DoublesRupen Shah / Alison Andrus vs Amanda Fuller / Jungyun Hwang6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesRoy Cribb / Mary Cribb vs Josh Spink / Valerie de Crecy6-4, 6-4
2023-03-26vs ALACHUA/Blair/40&Over8.0XDWon 10
W#3 DoublesRoy Cribb / Mary Cribb vs Christa Arnold / Eric Esterline6-2, 6-4
2023-02-23vs ALACHUA/Blair/40&Over8.0XDLost 01
L#3 DoublesMary Cribb / Roy Cribb vs Marko Suvajdzic / Ekanong van Roy0-6, 2-6
2023-02-16vs JTC - FullerLost 02
L#1 DoublesRupen Shah / Stephanie Ryan vs Jungyun Hwang / Carolyn Shinn2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRoy Cribb / Alison Andrus vs Boris Kuchuk / Amanda Fuller4-6, 6-1, 0-1
2023-02-05vs JTC - FullerSplit 11
L#2 DoublesRupen Shah / Alison Andrus vs Cynthia Thibault / Corey Sobers3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesRoy Cribb / Mary Cribb vs Josh Spink / Cathy Boon6-4, 6-4
2023-02-04vs ALACHUA/Blair/40&Over8.0XDLost 01
L#3 DoublesStephanie Ryan / Roy Cribb vs MEGAN MOLYNEUX / Dan Weisman0-6, 1-6
2023-01-14vs JTC - FullerWon 20
W#2 DoublesRupen Shah / Stephanie Ryan vs Randy Heron / Susan Benton6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesRoy Cribb / Mary Cribb vs Boris Kuchuk / Maria Curatolo6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Mixed 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Alison Andrus
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.72
Roy Cribb
usually #3 Doubles 88%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 4
3.53
Rupen Shah
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.52
Kim Magee
published
3.39
Stephanie Ryan
published
3.34
Kannika Torres
published
3.08
Jigisha Shah
published
Mary Cribb
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Roy Cribb + Mary Cribb5255% gamesnot enough data
Mary Cribb + Rupen Shah1438% gamesnot enough data
Alison Andrus + Rupen Shah224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Alison Andrus
79W–67L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%87%12%
3.84
4
Roy Cribb
46W–35L career · 8 lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Rupen Shah
200W–161L career · 7 lines in 2023
41%59%<1%
3.53
Kim Magee
10W–13L career · no lines in 2023
45%55%<1%
3.52
Stephanie Ryan
9W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%77%22%
3.39
Kannika Torres
11W–11L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%12%
3.34
Jigisha Shah
7W–10L career · no lines in 2023
28%71%<1%
3.08
Mary Cribb
34W–55L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.