Teams

SDNC 4.0 Brengle Terr (2:3)/ Bernard

2025 Adult 18 & Over Spring - SDNC WE · SDNC - Men - 4.0

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#1 DoublesRichard Tanko / Evan Green vs Mark Schmitt / Steve Kimble4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTim McDonald / Bill Lenaway vs Weidong Luo / Derek Gallup4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-05-25vs SDNC 4.0 RBS&TC (3:2)/ RamsayerSplit 11
L#2 SinglesRichard Tanko vs John Doe3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesMichael Russo / Bill Lenaway vs Derek Dutt / Douglas Ramsayer6-1, 6-1
2025-05-18vs SDNC 4.0 RPTC (3:2)/ YeemWon 10
W#3 DoublesPatrick Coughlin / Bill Lenaway vs Steve Firestone / Shimul Chowdhury6-4, 6-4
2025-05-17vs SDNC 4.0 RBHS (3:2)/ VillamorLost 01
L#2 SinglesMichael Russo vs David Witter6-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesBill Lenaway / Evan Green vs Jason Lane / Eric Berryman3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMichael Russo / Bill Lenaway vs Eugene Hotta / Robert Froyd6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2025-04-13vs SDNC 4.0 RBCTC (3:2)/ MoureyLost 01
L#2 DoublesBill Lenaway / Brian Stevens vs Prasanna Parthasarathy / Manish Watwani4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMichael Russo / Bill Lenaway vs Tim MacH / Arthur Lawida6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC - Men - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.78 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Jeff Baker
published
3.96
Bill Lenaway
usually #3 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.87
Brian Stevens
published 4
3.75
Scott Quintal
published
Richard Tanko
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.72
Robert Sheehan
published
3.70
Evan Green
published
3.65
Michael Russo
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4
3.61
Mark Rezac
published 4
Jeff Bernard
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bill Lenaway + Michael Russo4159% gamesnot enough data
Michael Russo + Evan Green134 matchesnot enough data
Evan Green + Mark Rezac224 matchesnot enough data
Bill Lenaway + Brian Stevens213 matchesnot enough data
Bill Lenaway + Mark Rezac213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jeff Baker
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
4.00
4
Bill Lenaway
61W–46L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
3.96
4
Brian Stevens
7W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.87
Scott Quintal
8W–8L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.75
4
Richard Tanko
13W–13L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Robert Sheehan
9W–5L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
Evan Green
6W–7L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
4
Michael Russo
107W–77L career · 4 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.65
4
Mark Rezac
87W–72L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.61
Jeff Bernard
9W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.