Teams

Kanawha J Walek

2025 Richmond Tri-Level Weeknight · Richmond Tri-Level Weeknight 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Men

18 players · average NTRP 3.30 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-09-21vs Ridgetoppers - RobertsWon 21
W#1 DoublesJoe Lacroix / Jory Brinkerhoff vs Doug Blouch / Bob Riggs6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesCreighton Anders / Casey Hill vs STEVEN ROBERTS / Ryan Gibson7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesEric Miller / Dawson Boyer vs Robert Mercurio / Sam Berg6-1, 6-2
2025-08-26vs Hermitage - BetzLost 03
L#1 DoublesJames Michau / Ward Hackett vs Bryan Fisher / Mac Stuckey2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCasey Hill / Elliott Gravitt vs John Gardner / Stuart Thompson4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesTravers Edwards / Jared Dunn vs Steven Smith / David Blankley1-6, 3-6
2025-08-21vs CCV PriceLost 03
L#1 DoublesJoe Lacroix / Jon Kilberg vs Whitson Huffman / Hunter Gallalee2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesWard Hackett / Creighton Anders vs Jonathan Henry / Ty Wellford6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesEric Miller / Patrick Barranger vs Chris Price / Gray Gilchrist3-6, 2-6
2025-08-19vs SCC Tri - StembridgeLost 12
L#1 DoublesJon Kilberg / Jory Brinkerhoff vs Daniel Poole / James Chicklo0-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCreighton Anders / Ward Hackett vs Brian Consolvo / Craig Leahy3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJason Walek / Travers Edwards vs Dan Stembridge / Gregory Moore4-6, 0-6
2025-08-12vs Westwood Lemco TriLost 12
W#1 DoublesJon Kilberg / Peyton Bowman vs Shailesh Khatri / Zachary Walton3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCreighton Anders / Elliott Gravitt vs James Faulstich / Kennon Harrison5-7, 6-7
L#3 DoublesCLIFFORD BRIDGE / Shaun Malik vs Joel Horning / Anthony Cargiulo7-5, 1-6, 0-1
2025-07-29vs Willow Oaks - BresslerLost 12
W#1 DoublesJon Kilberg / Joe Lacroix vs Chad Anderson / Bryan Pendleton6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCreighton Anders / Patrick Barranger vs Danny MacNelly / Scott Boyle4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesTravers Edwards / Jared Dunn vs George Forsythe / George Sibley4-6, 3-6
2025-07-22vs Westwood BrickleyLost 12
L#1 DoublesJames Michau / Jialin Weng vs Sean DiBlasi / Jacob Dyer3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesEric Miller / Casey Hill vs George Brickley / James Fernald5-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesPatrick Barranger / Dawson Boyer vs Cory Snyder / Richard Schenk6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Tri-Level Weeknight 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Peyton Bowman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.77
Jory Brinkerhoff
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.70
James Michau
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.63
Jon Kilberg
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.62
Joe Lacroix
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.43
Creighton Anders
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.42
Ward Hackett
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.33
Casey Hill
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Benjamin Pham
published 3.5
3.15
Patrick Barranger
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.99
Elliott Gravitt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.97
Dawson Boyer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.86
Shaun Malik
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.82
CLIFFORD BRIDGE
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.73
Travers Edwards
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.70
Jason Walek
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jared Dunn
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jialin Weng
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Casey Hill + Creighton Anders314 matchesnot enough data
Jon Kilberg + Joe Lacroix123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Peyton Bowman
7W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%8%
3.80
Jory Brinkerhoff
8W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
James Michau
6W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
Jon Kilberg
6W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.63
Joe Lacroix
7W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.62
3.5
Creighton Anders
29W–27L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.43
Ward Hackett
5W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Casey Hill
19W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.33
3.5
Benjamin Pham
10W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Patrick Barranger
16W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%14%86%
3.15
Elliott Gravitt
3W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
2.99
3
Dawson Boyer
9W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
2.97
Shaun Malik
7W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%83%16%
2.86
3
CLIFFORD BRIDGE
4W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
Travers Edwards
8W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
Jason Walek
22W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
7%91%2%
2.70
Jared Dunn
6W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jialin Weng
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.