Teams

Canyon Creek/Whitaker W3.5F

2026 DALLAS TENNIS N · A 18 & Over ADULT Fall W. Friday

15 players · average NTRP 3.60 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-10-31vs Bent Tree/Sarche-Wilder W3.5FWon 20
W#1 DoublesCamille Davenport / Jacqueline Carson vs Julie Hamilton / Rayshell McGraw6-1, 0-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesBrianna Fluellen vs Abigail Rogers6-2, 6-0
2025-10-27vs Fretz/Scott-Wood W3.5FWon 20
W#1 DoublesJacqueline Carson / Camille Davenport vs Rebecca Scott / Angie Wood6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesBrianna Fluellen / Jordan Watson vs Cindy Lodewick / Allison Lockard6-4, 6-3
2025-10-24Won 10
W#1 SinglesCamille Davenport vs Annette Delbridge6-2, 6-2
2025-10-10vs Gleneagles/Steyn-Priebe W3.5FWon 10
W#3 DoublesMelanie Powell / Brianna Fluellen vs Rachelle Brown / Becki Novak6-2, 6-0
2025-10-03vs McKinney/Garza-Pike W3.5FWon 21
W#1 DoublesSarah Snitker / Kristen Economaki vs Laurie Deckert / Rachel Garza6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesChrissy Stansell / Brianna Fluellen vs Becky Connet / Natalie Gilbert6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJennifer Whitaker / Shelley Hicks vs Lea Plamann / Jennifer Dugan4-6, 5-7
W#1 DoublesKristen Economaki / Sarah Snitker vs Dana Maksimovich / Jana Ricker6-4, 6-0
L#1 SinglesBrianna Fluellen vs Kelsey Thornton1-6, 2-6
2025-09-19vs Oak Creek/Kaplan-Grubstein W3.5FWon 21
W#1 DoublesJacqueline Carson / Camille Davenport vs Lacey Gardner / Rena Grubstein6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesKristen Economaki vs Adrienne Bransky6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesBrianna Fluellen / Jordan Watson vs Nancy McGuire / Pamela Pluss6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2025-09-12vs TBarM/Dodgen-LaRosen W3.5FWon 10
W#1 DoublesSarah Snitker / Camille Davenport vs Amanda Francis / Natalie Mowan6-4, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for A 18 & Over ADULT Fall W. Friday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Chrissy Stansell
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.56
Jacqueline Carson
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.54
Sarah Snitker
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.42
Camille Davenport
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.33
Jenifer Mathews
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
3.29
Melissa Fox
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
3.29
Brianna Fluellen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.27
ROSEMARY BATES
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.25
Ashley Samber
usually #1 Doubles 58%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.24
Jennifer Whitaker
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.10
Colleen Petersen
published 3.5
2.99
Shelley Hicks
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Hazel Robbins
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Kristen Economaki
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Tarryn Uran
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 23% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Camille Davenport + Jacqueline Carson11069% games+18.1% vs expected
Ashley Samber + Sarah Snitker9266% games+9.4% vs expected
Sarah Snitker + Jacqueline Carson7164% games+2.1% vs expected
Hazel Robbins + Tarryn Uran5260% gamesnot enough data
Ashley Samber + Tarryn Uran224 matchesnot enough data
Chrissy Stansell + Melissa Fox404 matchesnot enough data
ROSEMARY BATES + Jacqueline Carson123 matchesnot enough data
Brianna Fluellen + Jenifer Mathews303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Chrissy Stansell
20W–6L career · 9 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.70
Jacqueline Carson
38W–6L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%33%67%
3.56
Sarah Snitker
30W–5L career · 15 lines in 2026
<1%39%61%
3.54
3.5
Camille Davenport
20W–1L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
3.42
Jenifer Mathews
15W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%88%12%
3.33
Melissa Fox
24W–7L career · 7 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Brianna Fluellen
16W–9L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.29
ROSEMARY BATES
21W–30L career · 7 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Ashley Samber
26W–10L career · 12 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
Jennifer Whitaker
7W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Colleen Petersen
1W–3L career · no lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
3.10
Shelley Hicks
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
54%46%<1%
2.99
Hazel Robbins
13W–10L career · 9 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kristen Economaki
4W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Tarryn Uran
23W–7L career · 13 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.