Teams

WI Adult 18&O 3.5M NEL Valley YMCA Addo FCWT

2022 WI Adult 18 & Over · WI Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.75 / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
W#1 DoublesRamesh Kakula / Chad Patch vs Joshua Brown / Aaron Kolz6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesBill van Nuland vs Gavin Mangold6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesPramod Shinde / Tswvyim Yang vs Samuel Noll / Lucas Mullen6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDerek Wroblewski / David Gahagan vs Thomas Brodhagen / Eric Bishop6-1, 6-0
L#1 DoublesKyle Oberstadt / David Gahagan vs Daniel Wickman / Erik McElrone2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesBill van Nuland vs Thomas White6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRamesh Kakula / Chad Patch vs John Allen / C H6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDerek Wroblewski / Pramod Shinde vs Edward Bongiorno / Ross Mollet6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 DoublesChad Patch / Ramesh Kakula vs Duane Brandt / Brian Spaeth6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesKyle Oberstadt / Derek Wroblewski vs Mark Putzier / Matthew Lemke7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesTswvyim Yang / Pramod Shinde vs Richard Gerstein / Jack Matlock6-1, 6-1
L#1 DoublesKyle Oberstadt / David Gahagan vs Samuel Noll / Lucas Mullen6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesPramod Shinde / Haydar Saleh vs Aaron Kolz / Gavin Mangold6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesChristopher Mitchell / Adam Goerlitz vs Andy Taylor / Jeff Crowell7-5, 6-2
L#1 DoublesDavid Gahagan / Christopher Mitchell vs Ganesh Vaidyanathan / John Allen0-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesTswvyim Yang vs Ross Mollet6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesHaydar Saleh / Pramod Shinde vs Patrick McDonough / Matt Senior6-3, 6-0
W#1 DoublesChad Patch / Ramesh Kakula vs Todd Hammond / Brian Spaeth6-3, 7-5
W#1 SinglesBill van Nuland vs John Casper3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPramod Shinde / Kyle Oberstadt vs Matthew Lemke / Richard Gerstein3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 DoublesChad Patch / Ramesh Kakula vs Lucas Mullen / Andy Taylor6-1, 7-5
W#1 SinglesBill van Nuland vs Joshua Brown6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDavid Gahagan / Derek Wroblewski vs Samuel Noll / Jeff Crowell6-4, 7-6
W#2 SinglesTswvyim Yang vs Gavin Mangold6-1, 6-3
L#1 DoublesChad Patch / David Gahagan vs Daniel Wickman / Erik McElrone2-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesTswvyim Yang vs Ganesh Vaidyanathan6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDerek Wroblewski / Christopher Mitchell vs Peter Nowak / C H5-7, 2-6
L#2 SinglesPIYUSH ATRE vs Thomas White1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesPramod Shinde / Kyle Oberstadt vs John Allen / Patrick McDonough4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#1 SinglesBill van Nuland vs Jonathan Paque6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · WI Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WI Adult 18&O 3.5M NEL Valley YMCA Addo FCWT72321335330
2WI Adult 18&O 3.5M NEL WRFC Capone Nice Aces72301536347
3WI Adult 18&O 3.5M NEL Oshkosh W HS Hammond Hammond 3.545212453407
4WI Adult 18&O 3.5M NEL GBTC Kolz GBTC Men0973880519

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Ramesh Kakula
published
Ivor Addo
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.58
Chad Patch
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.52
Bill van Nuland
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.27
David Gahagan
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
Christopher Mitchell
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Haydar Saleh
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Pramod Shinde
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
3.14
Kyle Oberstadt
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Derek Wroblewski
published
PIYUSH ATRE
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Tswvyim Yang
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pramod Shinde + PIYUSH ATRE213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ramesh Kakula
21W–7L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.78
4
Ivor Addo
104W–18L career · 9 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Chad Patch
74W–53L career · 10 lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
3.58
4
Bill van Nuland
22W–14L career · 5 lines in 2022
44%55%<1%
3.52
3.5
David Gahagan
75W–57L career · 6 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Christopher Mitchell
9W–19L career · type M · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Haydar Saleh
2W–5L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Pramod Shinde
45W–31L career · 7 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.19
Kyle Oberstadt
56W–57L career · 5 lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.14
Derek Wroblewski
16W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
PIYUSH ATRE
33W–40L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Tswvyim Yang
14W–3L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.