Teams

KJohnson (Sardis)

2022 Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Combo 6.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-09-26vs NBrasch (PCC)Split 11
W#1 DoublesAmy Bundrick / Katie Crosby vs Karen Claffey / Lee Sugg6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesKatie Ferry / Judy Kilduff vs Natasha Brasch / Ashley Hall6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2022-09-19vs JGrahl (Mountainbrook)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesAmy Bundrick / Amy Dockery vs Laura Grant / Julie Grahl1-6, 0-6
2022-09-15vs LSimmons (MPCC)Won 10
W#1 DoublesKatie Crosby / Amy Bundrick vs Lesley Burke / Alison Milas6-1, 6-4
2022-09-12vs AIannuzzi/MSevigny (Carmel)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAmy Bundrick / Katie Ferry vs Maria Sevigny / Katie McGuire4-6, 4-6
2022-08-29vs MBell (Charlotte Country Club)Won 10
W#1 DoublesJudy Kilduff / Katie Ferry vs Mandi Bell / Catherine Ruth Kelly7-6, 6-3
2022-08-22vs BBrown (Park Crossing)Split 11
W#1 DoublesAmy Bundrick / Katie Crosby vs Cherie Bouchon / Ann Marie Selee6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKatie Ferry / Judy Kilduff vs Rebecca Brown / Tish Macuga6-7, 2-6
2022-08-15vs BLindley (Firethorne)Won 10
W#1 DoublesAmy Dockery / Amy Bundrick vs Lauren Epperly / Danielle Shealy5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2022-08-08vs MJones/EPease (Life Time)Split 11
W#1 DoublesKatie Crosby / Amy Bundrick vs Kristy Simmons / Elizabeth Campbell6-2, 7-5
L#3 DoublesKatie Ferry / Judy Kilduff vs Cory Mondshane / Priscilla Navarrete1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Combo 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Katie Crosby
published
3.81
Amy Bundrick
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.70
Mary Laird Garrison
published
3.42
Erin Zelickson
published 3.5
3.39
Emily Battle
published 3.5
3.33
Dina Carey
published 3.5
3.33
Erica Adcock
published 3.5
3.29
Katie Ferry
published
3.15
Kate Johnson
published
2.98
Judy Kilduff
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erin Zelickson + Erica Adcock23367% games+8.9% vs expected
Katie Crosby + Mary Laird Garrison303 matchesnot enough data
Dina Carey + Mary Laird Garrison303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katie Crosby
69W–31L career · no lines in 2022
<1%67%32%
3.94
4
Amy Bundrick
29W–22L career · 7 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
Mary Laird Garrison
60W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%7%93%
3.70
3.5
Erin Zelickson
82W–27L career · no lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Emily Battle
1W–2L career · type A · no lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Dina Carey
40W–31L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Erica Adcock
76W–34L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.33
Katie Ferry
28W–13L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.29
Kate Johnson
33W–12L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.15
3
Judy Kilduff
49W–34L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%56%44%
2.98

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.