Teams

JVanDeWater(18+ Combo)

2022 Capital Combo 18 & Over · 8.5 Men

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-10-09vs IGJimenezWon 20
W#2 DoublesAmrit Narula / John VanDeWater vs Paul Weisner / Pedro Loaiza6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLaurence Isaacs / Christopher Lloyd vs Justin Prins / Gabe Jimenez6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2022-10-05vs RMcClennyLost 01
L#1 DoublesJarod Styres / John VanDeWater vs Patrick Newsome / Brandon Keisner4-6, 3-6
2022-09-25vs DFarmer 18+ 8.5Split 11
W#2 DoublesJohn VanDeWater / Amrit Narula vs Gregory Isabwa / Michael Zurawel6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesLaurence Isaacs / Christopher Lloyd vs Jeremy Alston / Brent Nieri3-6, 3-6
2022-08-28vs SWingoWon 20
W#1 DoublesJarod Styres / Amrit Narula vs Casey Black / Eric Verhein7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesScott Schwartz / John VanDeWater vs Nile Testerman / Vann Taylor6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2022-08-21Lost 01
L#3 DoublesLaurence Isaacs / Amrit Narula vs Jay White / Jason Tuttle2-6, 1-6
2022-08-14vs RWalter 8.5 18+ RRCWon 10
W#1 DoublesJarod Styres / Amrit Narula vs Ryan Walter / Russell Riley6-3, 6-1
2022-08-07vs MLaddLost 01
L#3 DoublesLaurence Isaacs / Mark Combs vs Michael Ladd / Philippe Adams2-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Amrit Narula
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.84
Mark Combs
published
Dennis Tran
published 4
3.69
John VanDeWater
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.64
Laurence Isaacs
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.57
Takayuki Yamato
published
3.47
Jeff Plemmons
published
Jarod Styres
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John VanDeWater + Amrit Narula213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amrit Narula
148W–65L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%62%38%
3.96
Mark Combs
14W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
3.84
4
Dennis Tran
0W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
John VanDeWater
149W–114L career · 4 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.69
4
Laurence Isaacs
48W–88L career · 4 lines in 2022
14%85%<1%
3.64
Takayuki Yamato
2W–6L career · no lines in 2022
29%71%<1%
3.57
Jeff Plemmons
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
58%42%<1%
3.47
Jarod Styres
2W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.