Teams

Plant City - D. Register

2022 Hillsborough Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Adult 40 & Over Day - Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.40 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-05-26vs Davis Island - J. MaxwellWon 20
W#1 DoublesTammy Kip / Deborah Pyle vs Laura Salzer / Luz Maria von Greiff6-1, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLinda Leber / Dama Register vs Katherine Cowley / Nicole Malone6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesTammy Kip / Deborah Pyle vs Karlene Trosper / Kristy Simon3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDang Williamson / Linda Leber vs Melissa Renninger / Mary Murray2-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-05-05vs Buckhorn Hitwomen - T. ManganelloSplit 11
L#1 SinglesAnne Jensen-McAvoy vs Meredith Vasey3-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesTammy Kip / Linda Leber vs Grace DiBenedetto / Nancy Dowdy6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2022-04-28vs FH Net Crashers - C. DemingSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLinda Leber / Dang Williamson vs Stephane Duroseau / Deb Spears2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesAnne Jensen-McAvoy vs Catherine Davidson6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2022-04-26vs Davis Island - J. MaxwellLost 01
L#1 DoublesTammy Kip / Anne Jensen-McAvoy vs Laura Salzer / Luz Maria von Greiff3-6, 4-6
2022-04-21vs FH Fireballs - N. KippLost 02
L#1 DoublesAnne Jensen-McAvoy / Barbara Dolan vs Krissy Heybroek / Darla Jones1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLinda Leber / Amanda Smith vs Jaime Martin / Sheryl Schumacher3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesAnne Jensen-McAvoy vs Kelly Wroten6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLinda Leber / Dang Williamson vs Lara Saade / Cathy Steigerwald6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesDonna Schiebel / Linda Leber vs Bright Owens / Bonnie Neal0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 40 & Over Day - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Cassie Miller
published 4
3.56
Nicole Giusto
published
3.54
Jennifer Spann
published
3.15
Deborah Pyle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Dang Williamson
published 3.5
2.91
Anne Jensen-McAvoy
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.70
Linda Leber
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
2.33
Barbara Dolan
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Linda Leber + Deborah Pyle6648% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cassie Miller
15W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%61%39%
3.96
Nicole Giusto
5W–10L career · no lines in 2022
32%67%<1%
3.56
Jennifer Spann
10W–10L career · no lines in 2022
37%63%<1%
3.54
3.5
Deborah Pyle
65W–55L career · 2 lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Dang Williamson
4W–15L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.11
3
Anne Jensen-McAvoy
59W–92L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
2.91
Linda Leber
58W–76L career · 7 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
2.70
3
Barbara Dolan
2W–9L career · no lines in 2022
90%10%<1%
2.33

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.