Teams

LA - Sassy, Classy and Savage

2021 SoCal Doubles - LA · LA - Women 4.5

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-12-11vs LA - Not Our FaultSplit 11
L#1 DoublesFrances Hong / Nancy Neuman vs Abbigail Fietzer / Ayanna Maharry1-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesHelen Brewer / Lily Reeves vs Celia Dominguez / Maria Menendez6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2021-12-04vs LA - Not Our FaultSplit 11
L#1 DoublesFrances Hong / Fredia Waters vs Karen Beard / Ayanna Maharry3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesGeraldine Brantley / Brigitte Champion vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesGeraldine Brantley / Tammy Finestone vs Michelle Zhong / Rachel Harbert2-6, 3-6
2021-11-14vs LA - Vamos!Lost 02
L#1 DoublesHolly Hubsher / Frances Hong vs Claudia Vine / Suzanne Cumbo1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesGeraldine Brantley / Jill Bauman vs Chiaki Ishihara / Eriko Shigenaga6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesGeraldine Brantley / Jill Bauman vs Brynna Pietz / Rachel Harbert1-6, 0-6
2021-10-24vs LA - Vamos!Lost 02
L#1 DoublesVanessa Paul / Geraldine Brantley vs Felicity Flesher / Christy Foreman2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLily Reeves / Nancy Neuman vs Chiaki Ishihara / Eriko Shigenaga4-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesLily Reeves / Rachael Stone vs April Hartstein / Michelle Zhong2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesTammy Finestone / Helen Brewer vs Michelle Tong Luo / Masami Hashimoto4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - Women 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.14
Rachael Stone
published
3.87
Jill Bauman
published
3.82
Tammy Finestone
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.77
Karla Boisvert
published
3.65
Frances Hong
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.63
Lily Reeves
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.61
Iris Cox
published 4
3.57
Geraldine Brantley
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.52
Fredia Waters
published 4
Sherryl Chaffin
published
Vanessa Paul
published
Victoria Wright
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lily Reeves + Geraldine Brantley224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rachael Stone
2W–3L career · no lines in 2021
15%85%<1%
4.14
Jill Bauman
11W–8L career · no lines in 2021
<1%84%16%
3.87
4
Tammy Finestone
95W–75L career · 7 lines in 2021
1%91%8%
3.82
Karla Boisvert
11W–6L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Frances Hong
74W–93L career · 3 lines in 2021
13%86%<1%
3.65
Lily Reeves
41W–59L career · 3 lines in 2021
17%83%<1%
3.63
4
Iris Cox
1W–6L career · no lines in 2021
20%80%<1%
3.61
4
Geraldine Brantley
63W–104L career · 5 lines in 2021
29%71%<1%
3.57
4
Fredia Waters
1W–4L career · no lines in 2021
42%58%<1%
3.52
Sherryl Chaffin
2W–8L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Vanessa Paul
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Victoria Wright
9W–5L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.