Teams

Mike 7.0 #2

2023 Mixed 18 and Over League · 7.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.38 / MAUI

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2023-04-09vs Wells GangLost 03
L#1 DoublesMina Chaikin / Jonathan Lau vs Pamela Henry / Gary Oshiro6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSusan Sato / Glenn Okimoto vs Clarita Balala / Clarence Kenui0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAmy Friedland / Richard Sato vs Stacie Thorlakson / David Raatz2-6, 5-7
2023-04-08vs Mike 7.0 #4Won 21
L#1 DoublesMina Chaikin / Emerson Timmins vs Gina Teliho / Solomon Palad2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesSusan Sato / Richard Sato vs Angelica Almogela / Ebi Amabebe6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLinda Coleon / Jonathan Lau vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-04-02vs Maui Country ClubLost 03
L#1 DoublesSusan Sato / James Simmons vs Aiko da Silva / Matson Kelley6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesCarol Lam / Roy Matsuyama vs Jennifer Goldyn / Jonathan Yudis4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesLinda Coleon / Glenn Okimoto vs Laurel Falit / Tom Keirnes7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2023-04-01vs Mike 7.0 #1Lost 12
L#1 DoublesMina Chaikin / Emerson Timmins vs Crystal Graves / Charles Bisquera4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCarol Lam / James Simmons vs Susan Armstrong / Monty Tester6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesSusan Sato / Jonathan Lau vs Gaela Prince / Kevin Madaya3-6, 6-7
2023-03-26vs Mike 7.0 #3Lost 02
L#1 DoublesAmy Friedland / Jonathan Lau vs Susan Bailey / Ryan Brittle6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMina Chaikin / James Simmons vs Jill Kanahele / Michael Kinoshita2-6, 5-7
2023-03-25vs Wells GangLost 03
L#1 DoublesAmy Friedland / Emerson Timmins vs Diane Chaves / Gary Oshiro0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Sato / James Simmons vs Clarita Balala / Clarence Kenui6-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMina Chaikin / Jonathan Lau vs Pamela Henry / David Raatz2-6, 4-6
2023-03-19vs Mike 7.0 #4Split 11
W#1 DoublesMina Chaikin / Emerson Timmins vs Gina Teliho / Reuben Dela Cruz6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLinda Coleon / Jonathan Lau vs Chelsea LaBree / Ebi Amabebe6-7, 7-6, 0-1
2023-03-18vs Maui Country ClubLost 02
L#1 DoublesMina Chaikin / Emerson Timmins vs Judy Close / Paul Dunn3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLinda Coleon / Roy Matsuyama vs Catherine Hall / Mike Seguin5-7, 3-6
2023-03-12vs Mike 7.0 #1Lost 12
W#1 DoublesCarol Lam / Emerson Timmins vs Crystal Graves / Kevin Kato6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesDaphne Okamoto / Roy Matsuyama vs Susan Armstrong / Monty Tester7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAmy Friedland / Jonathan Lau vs Trudi Vierra / John Umeno4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2023-03-11vs Mike 7.0 #3Lost 03
L#1 DoublesCarol Lam / Emerson Timmins vs Jane Sakakihara / Kelly Tobita6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDaphne Okamoto / Roy Matsuyama vs Christina Haywood / Ryan Brittle6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLinda Coleon / Jonathan Lau vs Jill Kanahele / Steve Sutrov1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Emerson Timmins
usually #1 Doubles 78%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published
3.39
James Simmons
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.26
Carol Lam
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Daphne Okamoto
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.16
Mina Chaikin
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published
3.08
Linda Coleon
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.87
Jonathan Lau
usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published
2.82
Amy Friedland
published 3
Michael Kinoshita
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published
Richard Sato
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Susan Sato
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jonathan Lau + Linda Coleon1437% gamesnot enough data
Jonathan Lau + Carol Lam134 matchesnot enough data
Mina Chaikin + Emerson Timmins134 matchesnot enough data
Richard Sato + Susan Sato224 matchesnot enough data
Emerson Timmins + Carol Lam213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Emerson Timmins
79W–90L career · 9 lines in 2023
63%37%<1%
3.46
James Simmons
35W–35L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Carol Lam
72W–46L career · 4 lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Daphne Okamoto
29W–35L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Mina Chaikin
33W–33L career · 7 lines in 2023
13%86%1%
3.16
3.5
Linda Coleon
66W–142L career · 5 lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.08
Jonathan Lau
56W–129L career · 11 lines in 2023
83%17%<1%
2.87
3
Amy Friedland
49W–37L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
2.82
Michael Kinoshita
29W–56L career · 7 lines in 2023
not enough data
Richard Sato
10W–17L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Susan Sato
65W–62L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.